Carnap's Scientific Humanism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v13i3.5752Abstract
Scientific humanism is the formula by which Rudolf Carnap positions science as the best tool for improving life. Science allows us to maximize the rational character of human decisions on the basis of meta-values that include epistemic values and values for rational decision making. These values are politically neutral in that they are not tied to any partisan political position, but deeply political because they allow us to avoid irrational reasoning and to make the right use of science for our political and moral decisions. Maximizing rationality does not mean, for Carnap, that we must think and calculate before every action. Rather, the overall noncognitive character of values and decisions leads to a decisionist momentum, which means that we must find the right balance, both personally and politically, between sharp thinking and following our attitudes, because science is a signpost, not a leader, in life. Carnap’s views are rooted in the intellectual currents of early twentieth-century Central Europe, including Max Weber’s scientific value-neutrality, the German Life Reform and Youth Movement, Lebensphilosophie, the decisionism of the 1920s, and the empiriocriticist branch of Austrian social democracy.
References
Carnap, Rudolf. 1929. “Wissenschaft Und Leben. (Für Vortrag Dessau).” Rudolf Carnap Papers, Archives of Scientific Philosophy, University Library System, University of Pittsburgh (RC 110-07-49). https://doi.org/10.48666/807581.
———. 1932. “Überwindung Der Metaphysik Durch Logische Analyse Der Sprache.” Erkenntnis 2: 219–41.
———. 1934a. “Philosophie - Opium Für Die Gebildeten.” Rudolf Carnap Papers, Archives of Scientific Philosophy, University Library System, University of Pittsburgh (RC 110-08-17). https://doi.org/10.48666/807585.
———. 1934b. “Theoretische Fragen Und Praktische Entscheidungen.” Natur Und Geist 2: 257–60.
———. 1935. Philosophy and Logical Syntax. London: Kegan Paul.
———. 1937a. “Logic.” In Factors Determining Human Behavior, edited by Edgar Douglas, 107–18. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1937b. The Logical Syntax of Language. London: Kegan Paul, Trench Trubner & Co. Ltd.
———. 1950. Logical Foundations of Probability. London: Routledge.
———. 1954. “Theoretical Questions and Practical Decisions (1954-05-28).” Rudolf Carnap Papers, Archives of Scientific Philosophy, University Library System, University of Pittsburgh (RC 085-73-03). https://doi.org/10.48666/828967.
———. 1955. “Für Vortrag: Theoretical Questions and Practical Decisions (1955-04-16).” Rudolf Carnap Papers, Archives of Scientific Philosophy, University Library System, University of Pittsburgh (RC 085-73-02). https://doi.org/10.48666/828965.
———. 1962. “The Aim of Inductive Logic.” In Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, edited by Ernest Nagel, Patrick Suppes, and Alfred Tarski, 303–18. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
———. 1963a. “Intellectual Autobiography.” In The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, 3–84. La Salle: Open Court.
———. 1963b. “Replies and Systematic Expositions.” In The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, 859–1013. La Salle: Open Court.
———. (1928) 1967. The Logical Structure of the World: Pseudoproblems in Philosophy. London: Routledge.
———. 2017. “Value Concepts (1958).” Synthese 194: 185–94.
———. 2022a. “Deutschlands Niederlage. Sinnloses Schicksal Oder Schuld?” In Logical Empiricism, Life Reform, and the German Youth Movement / Logischer Empirismus, Lebensreform Und Die Deutsche Jugendbewegung, edited by Christian Damböck, Günther Sandner, and Meike Werner, 325–35. Dordrecht: Springer.
———. 2022b. Tagebücher 1920-1935. Edited by Christian Damböck. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
———. Forthcoming. Tagebücher 1936-1970. Edited by Christian Damböck. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Carus, A. W. 2007. Carnap and Twentieth-Century Thought: Explication as Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2017. “Carnapian Rationality.” Synthese 194: 163–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0574-3.
———. 2021. “Werte Beim Frühen Carnap: Von Den Anfängen Bis Zum Aufbau.” In Der Junge Carnap in Historischem Kontext, edited by Christian Damböck and Gereon Wolters, 1–18. Cham: Springer.
———. 2022. “Carnap’s Fundamental Philosophical Commitment: From Religious Origins to Kantian Non-Cognitivism, 1911-21.” In The Vienna Circle and Religion, edited by Esther Ramharter, 3–22. Cham: Springer.
Dahms, Hans-Joachim. 2004. “Neue Sachlichkeit in the Architecture and Philosophy of the 1920s.” In Carnap Brought Home: The View from Jena, edited by Steve Awodey and Carsten Klein, 357–76. Chicago: Open Court.
Damböck, Christian. 2012. “Rudolf Carnap and Wilhelm Dilthey: ‘German’ Empiricism in the Aufbau.” In Carnap and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism, Institute Vienna Circle Yearbook, edited by Richard Creath, 75–96. Springer, Dordrecht.
———. 2022a. “Carnap, Reichenbach, Freyer. Non-Cognitivist Ethics and Politics in the Spirit of the German Youth-Movement.” In Logical Empiricism, Life Reform, and the German Youth-Movement, edited by Christian Damböck, Günther Sandner, and Meike Werner, 163–80. Cham: Springer.
———. 2022b. “Carnap’s Non-Cognitivism and His Views on Religion, Against the Background of the Herbartian Philosophy of His Grandfather Friedrich Wilhelm Dörpfeld.” In The Vienna Circle and Religion, edited by Esther Ramharter, 23–40. Springer, Dordrecht.
———. 2022c. “The Politics of Carnap’s Non-Cognitivism and the Scientific World-Conception of Left-Wing Logical Empiricism.” Perspectives on Science 30: 493–524. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00372.
———. 2024a. “Carnap’s Noncognitivism: Paths and Influences.” In Interpreting Carnap, edited by Alan Richardson and Adam Tamas Tuboly, 13–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2024b. “Carnap Und Heidegger. Politische Antimetaphysik Versus Metaphysik Als Metapolitik.” Deutsche Zeitschrift Für Philosophie.
———. 2024c. “Carnaps Ästhetik: Der Logische Aufbau Der Welt Im Kontext Des Nach-Expressionismus.” In Franz Roh: Neue Sachlichkeit Und Logischer Empirismus, edited by Hans-Joachim Dahms, 83–107. Vienna: Virtual Archive of Logical Empiricism.
———. 2024d. “Entscheidungstheoretische, Modallogische Und Metaethische Gesichtspunkte in Carnaps ‘Value Concepts (1958)’.” In Revisiting the History and Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics, edited by Elena Ficara, Julia Franke-Reddig, Anna-Sophie Heinemann, and Andrea Reichenberger. College Publications.
———. 2025. “Noncognitive Deliberation: The Political Legacy of Logical Empiricism.” Erkenntnis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-024-00911-7.
Damböck, Christian, Günther Sandner, and Meike G. Werner, eds. 2022. Logical Empiricism, Life Reform, and the German Youth Movement / Logischer Empirismus, Lebensreform Und Die Deutsche Jugendbewegung. Cham: Springer.
Dewulf, Fons. 2017. “Rudolf Carnap’s Incorporation of the Geisteswissenschaften in the Aufbau.” HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7: 199–225.
Dörpfeld, Friedrich Wilhelm. 1895. Zur Ethik. Gütersloh: Druck und Verlag von C. Bertelsmann.
Douglas, Heather. 2000. “Inductive Risk and Values in Science.” Philosophy of Science 67: 559–79. https://doi.org/10.1086/392855.
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina, and Erich H. Reck. 2017. “Carnapian Explication, Formalisms as Cognitive Tools, and the Paradox of Adequate Formalization.” Synthese 194: 195–215.
Frank, Philipp. 2021. The Humanistic Background of Science. Edited by George A. Reisch and Adam Tamas Tuboly. Albani: State University of New York Press.
Friedman, Michael. 2000. A Parting of the Ways. Chicago: Open Court Press.
Gabriel, Gottfried. 2003. “Carnap’s ‘Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language’: A Retrospective Consideration of the Relationship Between Continental and Analytic Philosophy.” In Ogical Empiricism. Historical & Contemporary Perspectives, edited by Paolo Parrini, 30–42. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
———. 2004. “Introduction: Carnap Brought Home.” In Carnap Brought Home: The View from Jena, edited by Steve Awodey and Carsten Klein, 3–24. Chicago: Open Court.
Galison, Peter. 1990. “Aufbau/Bauhaus: Logical Positivism and Architectural Modernism.” Critical Inquiry 16: 709–52.
Heidegger, Martin. (1929) 1991. Kant Und Das Problem Der Metaphysik. Frankfurt/Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidelberger, Michael. 2024. “Between Pietism and Herbartianism: Archaeological Vestiges in Carnap’s Thought.” In Ways of the Scientific World Conception: Rudolf Carnap and Otto Neurath, edited by Christian Damböck, Johannes Friedl, and Ulf Höfer. Leiden: Brill.
Hempel, Carl G. 1965. “Science and Human Values.” In Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, 81–96. New York: Free Press.
Leighton, Joseph Alexander. 1939. “History as the Struggle for Social Values.” The Philosophical Review 48: 118–54.
List, Christian. 2018. “Democratic Deliberation and Social Choice: A Review.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by André Bächtiger, 463–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mittelstraß, Gustav, ed. 1919. Freideutscher Jugendtag 1913. Hamburg: Freideutscher Jugendverlag Adolf Saal.
Næss, Arne. 1968. Four Modern Philosophers: Carnap, Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Sartre. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Neurath, Otto. (1913) 1983. “The Lost Wanderers of Descartes and the Auxiliary Motive.” In Otto Neurath, Philosophical Papers 1913-1946, edited by Robert S. Cohen and Marie Neurath, 1–12. Springer Dordrecht.
———. 1996. “Visual Education: Humanisation Versus Popularisation.” In Encyclopedia and Utopia. The Life and Work of Otto Neurath (1882-1945), edited by Elisabeth Nemeth and Friedrich Stadler, 245–336. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ogden, C. K., and I. A. Richards. 1923. The Meaning of Meaning. New York: Harcourt.
Padovani, Flavia. 2022. “Hans Reichenbach and the Freistudentenschaft: School Reform, Pedagogy, and Freedom.” In Logical Empiricism, Life Reform, and the German Youth Movement, edited by Christian Damböck, Günther Sandner, and Meike Werner, 81–104. Cham: Springer.
Reichenbach, Hans. (1913) 1978. “The Free Student Idea: Its Unified Content.” In Hans Reichenbach: Selected Writings 1909-1953. Volume One, 108–23. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Reisch, George A. 2005. How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy Slopes of Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, Alan. 2007. “Carnapian Pragmatism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Carnap, edited by Michael Friedman and Richard Creath, 295–315.
Romizi, Donata. 2009. “The Vienna Circle’s ‘Scientific World Conception’: Philosophy of Science in a Political Arena.” HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2: 205–42.
Schroeder, Mark Andrew. 2010. Noncognitivism in Ethics. London: Routledge.
Stadler, Friedrich, and Thomas Uebel, eds. (1929) 2012. Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung. Der Wiener Kreis. Vienna: Springer-Verlag.
Stein, Howard. 1992. “Was Carnap Entirely Wrong, After All?” Synthese 93: 275–95.
Steinberger, Florian. 2015. “How Tolerant Can You Be? Carnap on Rationality.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92: 645–68.
Uebel, Thomas. 2004. “Carnap, the Left Vienna Circle, and Neopositivist Antimetaphysics.” In Carnap Brought Home: The View from Jena, edited by Steve Awodey and Carsten Klein, 247–78. Chicago: Open Court.
———. 2005. “Political Philosophy of Science in Logical Empiricism: The Left Vienna Circle” 36: 754–73.
———. 2012. “Carnap, Philosophy and ‘Politics in the Broadest Sense’.” In Carnap and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism, Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, edited by Richard Creath, 133–48.
———. 2020. “Intersubjective Accountability: Politics and Philosophy in the Left Vienna Circle.” Perspectives on Science 28: 35–62.
van Roojen, Mark. 2018. “Moral Cogntivism Vs. Non-Cognitivism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-cognitivism/.
Verhaegh, Sander. 2020. “Coming to America: Carnap, Reichenbach and the Great Intellectual Migration. Part I: Rudolf Carnap.” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 8: 1–23.
Vrahimis, Andreas. 2020. “The Vienna Circle’s Reception of Nietzsche.” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 8: 1–29.
Weber, Max. (1919) 2014. “Science as a Profession and Vocation [Wissenschaft Als Beruf].” In Max Weber: Collected Methodological Writings, 335–53. London: Routledge.
Werner, Meike G. 2003. Moderne in Der Provinz. Kulturelle Experimente Im Fin-de-Siècle Jena. Göttingen: Wallstein-Verlag.
———. 2022. “Youth and Politics at the End of the Great War: Rudolf Carnap’s Politische Rundbriefe of 1918.” In Logical Empiricism, Life Reform, and the German Youth Movement / Logischer Empirismus, Lebensreform Und Die Deutsche Jugendbewegung, edited by Christian Damböc, Günther Sandner, and Meike Werner, 105–26. Dordrecht: Springer.
Yap, Audrey. 2024. “Philosophy in a Collective Spirit as ‘Politics in Its Broadest Sense’.” In Interpreting Carnap, edited by Alan Richardson and Adam Tamas Tuboly, 70–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
