https://jhaponline.org/jhap/issue/feed Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 2018-06-18T14:16:47-04:00 Kevin C. Klement klement@philos.umass.edu Open Journal Systems JHAP aims to promote research in and discussion of the history of analytical philosophy. <a href="/jhap/about">Read more ...</a> https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/3234 Roman Ingarden’s “The Logical Attempt at a New Formulation of Philosophy: A Critical Remark” 2018-06-18T14:16:47-04:00 Bernard Linsky bernard.linsky@ualberta.ca <p>Translated by Bernard Linsky</p> <p>This is the first English translation of Roman Ingarden’s paper presented at the 8th World Congress of Philosophy held in Prague in 1934: “Der Logistische Versuch einer Neugestaltung der Philosophie: Eine Kritische Bemerkung”, translated here as “The Logical Attempt at a New Formulation of Philosophy: A Critical Remark”. Also translated here are brief discussions by Rudolf Carnap and Otto Neurath. These essays were published in the original German in the Proceedings of the Congress in 1936. This statement of Ingarden’s criticisms of the doctrines of the Vienna Circle has been mentioned in print, but his views have not been discussed, or indeed accurately reported to date.</p> 2018-05-14T14:22:16-04:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/3233 Verification: The Hysteron Proteron Argument 2018-06-18T14:16:47-04:00 Francis Jeffry Pelletier francisp@ualberta.ca Bernard Linsky blinsky@ualberta.ca <p>This paper investigates the strange case of an argument that was directed against a positivist verification principle. We find an early occurrence of the argument in a talk by the phenomenologist Roman Ingarden at the 1934 International Congress of Philosophy in Prague, where Carnap and Neurath were present and contributed short rejoinders. We discuss the underlying presuppositons of the argument, and we evaluate whether the attempts by Carnap (especially) actually succeed in answering this argument. We think they don’t, and offer instead a few sociological thoughts about why the argument seems to have disappeared from the profession’s evaluaton of the positivist criterion of verifiability.</p> 2018-05-14T14:38:47-04:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement##