Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy <p>JHAP aims to promote research in and discussion of the history of analytical philosophy. <a href="/jhap/about">Read more ...</a></p> en-US <p>The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a <a href="">Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license</a>. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:</p><ol><li>Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a <a href="">Creative Commons BY-NC license</a>.</li><li>Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.</li><li>Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)</li></ol><p><a href="" rel="license"><img style="border-width: 0;" src="" alt="Creative Commons License" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a href="" rel="license">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License</a>.</p> (Marcus Rossberg) (gabriela mircea) Mon, 01 Oct 2018 14:59:58 -0400 OJS 60 Three Positivist Disputes in the 1960s <p>The West German positivist dispute in the 1960s is well known and thoroughly studied. At about the same time positivist disputes also took place in two Scandinavian countries: one in Norway and one in Sweden. What did the front lines in the debate look like in the three countries? What was the outcome of the different disputes? The main focus in the article is on the Swedish case, but some comparative perspectives relating to the three disputes will also be presented. The Swedish positivist dispute originated with Gerard Radnitzky’s doctoral dissertation in theory of science, defended at the University of Gothenburg in May 1968, <em>Contemporary Schools of Metascience</em> (2 volumes). The dissertation caused a stir of controversy. It meant a challenge to the Swedish philsophical establishment because it leaned heavily on continental philosophers such as Karl-Otto Apel and Jürgen Habermas, who at the time were more or less unknown in Sweden. The controversy was continuated in the following years, most notably in the leftist journal <em>Häften för kritiska studier</em> (<em>Notebooks for Critical Studies</em>).</p> Carl-Göran Heidegren ##submission.copyrightStatement## Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:33:48 -0400 Pieranna Garavaso and Nicla Vassallo, Frege on Thinking and Its Epistemic Significance <p><span class="a-size-base a-color-base">Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2015.</span></p> <p><span class="a-size-base a-color-base">125 + viii pages. $87 Hardcover. ISBN 978-0-739-17838-6.</span></p> <p><span class="a-size-base a-color-base">Reviewed by Rasa Davidaviciute.</span></p> Rasa Davidaviciute ##submission.copyrightStatement## Mon, 01 Oct 2018 11:37:42 -0400