E. E. Constance Jones on Existence in a Region of Supposition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v11i7.5485Abstract
In “On the Nature of Logical Judgment” (published 1893) and A New Law of Thought and Its Logical Bearings (published 1911), E. E. Constance Jones developed a view on which we can think and talk about the round-square. On her view, the round-square has a kind of existence; otherwise, sentences about it wouldn’t be meaningful. But it doesn’t exist in space, since it’s both round and square, and nothing in space is both. Although it has a kind of existence in what she calls “a Region of Supposition,” we can truly say that it “doesn’t exist,” if what we mean is that it doesn’t exist in space. It plays a role in reasoning, since we need to be able to reason about it to conclude that it doesn’t exist in space. And, although the round-square is both round and square, the Law of Contradiction needn’t be violated, provided that it’s understood in light of Jones’s distinction between two kinds of negation.
References
Ashworth, E. J. 1977. “Chimeras and Imaginary Objects: A Study in the Post-Medieval Theory of Signification.” Vivarium 15 (1): 57–77.
Baumgartner, Wilhelm. 2017. “The Innsbruck School.” In The Routledge Handbook of Franz Brentano and the Brentano School, edited by Uriah Kriegel, 341–48. London: Routledge.
Ben Asher, Sarale. 2022. “Meaning, Denotation, Proposition: The Debate Between Bertrand Russell and E. E. Constance Jones” Presented at the Central Division Meeting of the American Philosophical Association.
Betti, Arianna. 2017. “Twardowski and Brentano.” In The Routledge Handbook of Franz Brentano and the Brentano School, edited by Uriah Kriegel, 305–10. London: Routledge.
Caplan, Ben. 2022a. “E. E. Constance Jones on Existence in Fiction and Imagination.” Studia Semiotyczne (Semiotic Studies) 36 (1): 175–91.
———. 2022b. “E. E. Constance Jones on Unique Existence.” Asian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-022-00022-6.
Cohen, Wouter Adriaan. 2022. “Denoting Concepts and Ontology in Russell’s Principles of Mathematics.” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 10 (7). https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v10i7.5021.
Crane, Tim. 2013. The Objects of Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-8361.12137.
Hillebrand, Franz. 1891. Die neuen Theorien der kategorischen Schlüsse: Eine logische Untersuchung. Vienna: Hölder.
James, William. 1889. “The Psychology of Belief.” Mind (Old Series) 14 (55): 321–52.
Johnson, W. E. 1892. “The Logical Calculus. I. General Principles.” Mind 1 (1): 3–30.
———. 1893. “The Import of Categorical Propositions.” Mind 2 (6): 222–23.
Jones, E. E. Constance. 1890. Elements of Logic as a Science of Propositions. Edinburgh: Clark.
———. 1892a. An Introduction to General Logic. London: Longmans, Green.
———. 1892b. “Review of Die neuen Theorien der kategorischen Schlüsse: Eine logische Untersuchung by Franz Hillebrand.” Mind 1 (2): 276–81.
———. 1893a. “On the Nature of Logical Judgment.” Mind 2 (8): 441–56.
———. 1893b. “The Import of Categorical Propositions.” Mind 2 (6): 219–22.
———. 1893–1894a. “Import of Categorical Propositions.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society for the Systematic Study of Philosophy 2 (3): 35–45.
———. 1893–1894b. “Symposium—The Relation Between Thought and Language.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society for the Systematic Study of Philosophy 2 (3): 108–13.
———. 1905. A Primer of Logic. London: Murray.
———. 1906–1907. “Logic and Identity in Difference.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 7: 81–92.
———. 1908. “Precise and Numerical Identity.” Mind 17 (67): 384–97.
———. 1910. “Mr. Russell’s Objections to Frege’s Analysis of Propositions.” Mind 19 (75): 379–86.
———. 1910–1911. “A New Law of Thought.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11: 166–86.
———. 1911a. “A New ‘Law of Thought’ and Its Implications.” Mind 20 (77): 41–53.
———. 1911b. A New Law of Thought and Its Logical Bearings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1911c. “A New ‘Law of Thought’ and Its Logical Implications.” Atti del IV Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia 2: 440–43.
———. 1913. “Analysis of Categorical Propositions.” Mind 22 (88): 526–31.
———. 1914–1915. “Symposium—The Import of Propositions.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 15: 353–412.
———. 1922. As I Remember: An Autobiographical Ramble. London: Black.
Lewis, David K. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.
———. 1990. “Noneism or Allism?” Mind 99 (393): 23–31.
Lycan, William G. 1994. Modality and Meaning. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
McDaniel, Kris. 2017. The Fragmentation of Being. New York: Oxford University Press.
McGinn, Colin. 2000. Logical Properties: Identity, Existence, Predication, Necessity, Truth. Oxford: Clarendon.
Meinong, Alexius. 1899. “Ueber Gegenstände höherer Ordnung und deren Verhältniß zur inneren Wahrnehmung.” Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane 21: 182–272. Translated by Marie-Luise Schubert Kalsi as “On Objects of Higher Order and Their Relationship to Internal Perception” in Alexius Meinong, On Objects of Higher Order and Husserl’s Phenomenology (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1978), 137–200.
———. 1904. “Über Gegenstandstheorie.” In Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie, edited by Alexius Meinong, 1–51. Leipzig: Barth. Translated by Isaac Levi, D. B. Terrell, and Roderick M. Chisholm as “The Theory of Objects” in Roderick M. Chisholm, ed., Realism and the Background of Phenomenology (Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1960), 76–117.
———. 1907. Über die Stellung der Gegenstandstheorie im System der Wissenschaften. Leipzig: R. Voigtländer.
———. 1911. “Für die Psychologie und gegen den Psychologismus in der allgemeinen Werttheorie.” Atti del IV Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia 3: 132–47.
Ostertag, Gary. 2020. “Emily Elizabeth Constance Jones.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/emily-elizabeth-constance-jones/.
———. 2023. “E. E. Constance Jones on Identity and Predication.” In Women in the History of Analytic Philosophy: Selected Papers of the Tilburg--Groningen Conference, edited by Jeanne Peijnenburg and Sander Verhaegh, 49–66. Cham: Springer.
Parsons, Terence. 1980. Nonexistent Objects. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Peijnenburg, Jeanne, and Maria van der Schaar. Forthcoming. “E. E. Constance Jones and the Law of Significant Assertion.” In The Oxford Handbook of American and British Women Philosophers in the Nineteenth Century, edited by Lydia Moland and Alison Laura Stone. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Priest, Graham. 2016. Towards Non-Being: The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality. 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Russell, Bertrand. 1898. “An Analysis of Mathematical Reasoning Being an Inquiry into the Subject-Matter, the Fundamental Conceptions, and the Necessary Postulates of Mathematics.” In The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Vol. 2 (Philosophical Papers 1896–99), edited by Nicholas Griffin and Albert C. Lewis, 163–242. London: Routledge.
———. 1903. The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1905. “On Denoting.” Mind 114 (14 (56)): 479–93.
———. 1907. “Review of Über die Stellung der Gegenstandstheorie im System der Wissenschaften by Alexius Meinong.” Mind 16 (63): 436–39.
———. 1967. The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell. Vol. 1 (1872–1914). Boston: Little, Brown.
Schaar, Maria van der. 1996. “From Analytic Psychology to Analytic Philosophy: The Reception of Twardowski’s Ideas in Cambridge.” Axiomathes 7 (3): 295–324.
———. 2013. G. F. Stout and the Psychological Origins of Analytic Philosophy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Simons, Peter. 2012. “To Be and/or Not to Be: The Objects of Meinong and Husserl.” In Categories of Being: Essays on Metaphysics and Logic, edited by Lila Haaparanta and Heikki Koskinen, 241–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stalnaker, Robert. 1996. “Impossibilities.” Philosophical Topics 24 (1): 193–204.
Stout, G. F. 1894. “Review of Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen: Eine psychologische Untersuchung by Kasimir Twardowski.” Mind 3 (10): 274–75.
———. 1896. Analytic Psychology, Vol. 1. London: Swan Sonnenschein.
———. 1900–1901. “The Common-Sense Conception of a Material Thing.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1: 1–17.
———. 1910–1911. “The Object of Thought and Real Being.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11: 187–205.
———. 1911. “Preface.” In A New Law of Thought and Its Logical Bearings., by E. E. Constance Jones, v–vii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1922. “The Late Miss E. E. Constance Jones.” Mind 31 (123): 383–84.
Sylvan, Richard. 1980. Exploring Meinong’s Jungle and Beyond: An Investigation of Noneism and the Theory of Items. Philosophy Department, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University. http://hdl.handle.net/11375/14805.
Turner, Jason. 2010. “Ontological Pluralism.” Journal of Philosophy 107 (1): 5–34.
———. 2020. “Ontological Pluralism.” In The Routledge Handbook of Metametaphysics, edited by Ricki Bliss and J. T. M. Miller, 184–95. New York: Routledge.
Twardowski, Kasimir [Kazimierz]. 1894. Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen: Eine psychologische Untersuchung. Vienna: Hölder. Translated by Reinhardt Grossmann as On the Content and Object of Presentations: A Psychological Investigation (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1977).
van Inwagen, Peter. 2014. “Modes of Being and Quantification.” Disputatio 6 (38): 1–24.
Venn, John. 1889. The Principles of Empirical or Inductive Logic. London: Macmillan.
Waithe, Mary Ellen, and Samantha Cicero. 1995. “E. E. Constance Jones (1848–1922).” In A History of Women Philosophers Vol. 4 (Contemporary Women Philosophers, 1900–Today), edited by Mary Ellen Waithe, 25–49. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
