Bertrand Russell’s Doxastic Sentimentalism (and Neutral Monism)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v12i6.5468Abstract
This paper reinterprets doxastic sentimentalism and neutral monism, as these doctrines appear in Bertrand Russell’s “On Propositions” (1919) and The Analysis of Mind (1921). It argues that Russell’s theory of belief, in this particular period, posited at least seven distinct types of feeling, but only one type of entity. The paper’s principal thesis is that Russell treated believing as feelings, but it also draws the conclusions that monism and sentimentalism are logically independent of one another, and that sentimentalism and (at least one type of) behaviorism are inconsistent, qua theories of belief.
References
Alter, Torin, and Yujin Nagasawa, eds. 2015. Consciousness in the Physical World: Perspectives on Russellian Monism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Apostolova, Iva. 2017. “Russell’s Two Theories of Memory.” Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 37: 307–33.
Baldwin, Thomas. 2003. “From Knowledge by Acquaintance to Knowledge by Causation.” In The Cambridge Companion to Bertrand Russell, edited by Nicholas Griffin, 420–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2018. “Truth in British Idealism and Its Analytic Critics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Truth, edited by Michael Glanzberg, 125–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Banks, Eric C. 2014. The Realistic Empiricism of Mach, James, and Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bostock, David. 2012. Russell’s Logical Atomism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brentano, Franz. 1959. Psychologie Vom Empirischen Standpunkt, Bd. II [1874]. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
———. 1995. Psychology from An Empirical Standpoint. Translated by Antos C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, and Linda L. McAlister. New York: Routledge.
Collins, Arthur W. 1999. “Behaviorism and Belief.” Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 96: 75–88.
Engelmann, Mauro L. 2012. “Wittgenstein’s New Method and Russell’s The Analysis of Mind.” Journal of Philosophical Research 37: 283–311.
Frege, Gottlob. 1918–1919. “Die Verneinung. Beiträge Zur Philosophie Des Deutschen Idealismus I,” 152–55.
Glanzberg, Michael. 2018. The Oxford Handbook of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Griffin, Nicholas. 2003. The Cambridge Companion to Bertrand Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hickerson, Ryan. 2020. Feelings of Believing: Psychology, History, Phenomenology. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Hochberg, Herbert. 2000. “Propositions, Truth, and Belief: The Wittgenstein-Russell Dispute.” Theoria 63: 3–40.
Holman, Emmett L. 2008. “Panpsychism, Physicalism, Neutral Monism and the Russellian Theory of Mind.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 15: 48–67.
Humberstone, I. L. 1996. “Intrinsic/Extrinsic.” Synthese 108: 205–67.
Hume, David. 2000. A Treatise of Human Nature. [1739-40]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
James, William. 1981. The Principles of Psychology, Vol. II. [1890]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Koç Maclean, Gülberk. 2014. Bertrand Russell’s Bundle Theory of Particulars. London: Bloomsbury.
Landini, Gregory. 2011. Russell. London: Routledge.
Linsky, Bernard. 1999. Russell’s Metaphysical Logic. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
MacBride, Fraser. 2013. “The Russell--Wittgenstein Dispute: A New Perspective.” In Judgement and Truth in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology, edited by Mark Textor, 206–41. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
McGuinness, Brian. 1984. Gottlob Frege: Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Misak, Cheryl. 2016. Cambridge Pragmatism: From Peirce and James to Ramsey and Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2019. “Russell and the Pragmatists.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Bertrand Russell, edited by Russell Wahl, 59–74. London: Bloomsbury.
Owen, David. 2000. Hume’s Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pears, David. 1975. Questions in the Philosophy of Mind. New York: Harper & Row.
———. 1989. “Russell’s 1913 Theory of Knowledge Manuscript.” In Rereading Russell: Essays in Bertrand Russell’s Metaphysics and Epistemology, edited by C. Wade Savage and C. Anthony Anderson, 169–82. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Pincock, Christopher. 2019. “Neutral Monism.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Bertrand Russell, edited by Russell Wahl, 312–33. London: Bloomsbury.
Ramsden Eames, Elizabeth, and Kenneth Blackwell, eds. 1984. The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Vol. 7: Theory of Knowledge: The 1913 Manuscript. London: George Allen & Unwin. Abbreviated as CP7.
Russell, Bertrand. 1914. “N the Nature of Acquaintance II. Neutral Monism.” The Monist 24: 186–87.
———. 1919. “On Propositions: What They Are and How They Mean.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary 2: 1–43.
———. 1921. The Analysis of Mind. London: George Allen & Unwin.
———. 1922. “Dr. Schiller’s Analysis of The Analysis of Mind.” The Journal of Philosophy XIX: 645–51.
———. 1954. The Analysis of Matter [1927]. New York: Dover Publications.
———. 1959. My Philosophical Development. London: George Allen & Unwin.
———. 1968. The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell: 1914--1944. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
———. 1995. The Analysis of Mind [1921]. London: Routledge. Abbreviated AMi.
Savage, C. Wade, and C. Anthony Anderson, eds. 1989. Rereading Russell: Essays in Bertrand Russell’s Metaphysics and Epistemology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Shirley, Greg. 2010. Heidegger and Logic: The Place of Lógos in Being and Time. New York: Continuum.
Slater, John G., ed. 1986. The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Vol. 8: The Philosophy of Logical Atomism and Other Essays: 1914-19. London: Unwin Hyman. Abbreviated as CP8.
———, ed. 1988. The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Vol. 9: Essays on Language, Mind and Matter 1919-26. London: Unwin Hyman. Abbreviated as CP9.
Stubenberg, Leopold. 2015. “Russell, Russellian Monism, and Panpsychism.” In Consciousness in the Physical World: Perspectives on Russellian Monism, edited by Torin Alter and Yujin Nagasawa, 58–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2018. “Neutral Monism.” Edited by Edward N. Zalta. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2018. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/neutral-monism/.
Stubenberg, Leopold, and Donovan Wishon. 2023. “Neutral Monism.” Edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2023 Edition. 2023. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/neutral-monism/.
Textor, Mark. 2013. Judgement and Truth in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tully, Robert. 1988. “Russell’s Neutral Monism.” Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 8: 209–24.
———. 2003. “Russell’s Neutral Monism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Bertrand Russell, edited by Nicholas Griffin, 332–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wahl, Russell, ed. 2019. The Bloomsbury Companion to Bertrand Russell. London: Bloomsbury.
Ward, James. 1906. Naturalism and Agnosticism: The Gifford Lectures Delivered Before the University of Aberdeen in the Years 1896--1898. [1899]. London: Adam and Charles Black.
Whitehead, Alfred North, and Bertrand Russell. 1925. Principia Mathematica, Vol. I. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wishon, Donovan. 2015. “Russell on Russellian Monism.” In Consciousness in the Physical World: Perspectives on Russellian Monism, edited by Torin Alter and Yujin Nagasawa, 91–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2021. “Radical Empiricism, Neutral Monism, and the Elements of Mind.” The Monist 104: 125–51.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
