Rules and Self-Citation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v11i3.5412Abstract
I discuss a neglected solution to the skeptical problem introduced by Lewis Carroll’s “What the Tortoise Said to Achilles” (1895) in terms of a self-citational inferential license. I then consider some responses to this solution. The most significant response on behalf of the skeptic utilizes the familiar distinction between two ways of accepting a rule: as action-guiding and as a mere truth. I argue that this is ultimately unsatisfactory and conclude by opting for an alternative conception of rules as representations of behavior deployed for various purposes, some theoretical and others practical. This alternative conception does not allow the skeptical problem to get off the ground.
References
Albritton, Rogers, 1985. “Freedom of the Will and Freedom of Action.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 59: 239–51.
Backström, Stina and Martin Gustafsson, 2017. “Skill, Drill, and Intelligent Performance: Ryle and Intellectualism.” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 5: 40–55.
Carroll, Lewis, 1895. “What the Tortoise Said to Achilles.” Mind 4: 278–80.
Cook, Roy, 2014. “There is No Paradox of Logical Validity.” Logica Universalis 8: 447–67.
Goldfarb, Warren, 2005. “On Gödel’s Way In: The Influence of Rudolf Carnap.” Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11: 185–93.
van Heijenoort, Jean, 1967. “Logic as Calculus and Logic as Language.” Synthese 17: 324–30.
Imholtz, Clare and Amirouche Moktefi, 2016. “What the Tortoise Said to Achilles: A Selective Bibliography.” The Carrollian: The Lewis Carroll Journal 28: 125–27.
Kaplan, David, 1975. “How to Russell a Frege-Church.” Journal of Philosophy 72: 716–29.
Russell, Bertrand, 1903. The Principles of Mathematic. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Ryle, Gilbert, 1946. “Knowing How and Knowing Tha.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46: 1–16.
Sellars, Wilfrid, 1949. “Language, Rules and Behavior.” In John Dewey: Philosopher of Science and Freedom, edited by S. Hook, pp. 289–315. New York: Dial Press.
Simchen, Ori, 2001. “Rules and Mention.” Philosophical Quarterly: 455–73.
———, 2013. “Token-Reflexivity.” Journal of Philosophy 110: 173–93.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1978. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, Revised Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
———, 2009. Philosophical Investigations, Fourth Edition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
