Schelling, Cavell, and the Truth of Skepticism
This paper argues that (1) McDowell wrongly assumes that “terror”, Cavell’s reaction to the radical contingency of our shared modes of knowing or our “attunement”, expresses a skepticism that is antinomically bound to an equally unacceptable dogmatism because (2) Cavell rather regards terror as a mood that reveals the “truth of skepticism”, namely, that there is no conclusive evidence for necessary attunement on pain of a category error, and that (3) a precedent for McDowell’s misunderstanding is Hegel’s argument for necessary attunement in a system of knowing, whose refutation Schelling holds it is the “merit of skepticism” to provide.
Bäckström, Stina, 2017. “What Is It to Depsychologize Psychology?” European Journal of Philosophy 25(2): 1–18.
Bowie, Andrew, 2014. “Nature and Freedom in Schelling and Adorno.” In Ostaric (2014), pp. 180–99.
Bruno, G. Anthony, 2013. “The Appearance and Disappearance of Intellectual Intuition in Schelling’s Philosophy.” Analecta Hermeneutica 5: 1–14.
———, 2014. “Freedom and Pluralism in Schelling’s Critique of Fichte’s Jena Wissenschaftslehre.” Idealistic Studies 43(1/2): 71–86.
———, 2015. “Epistemic Reciprocity in Schelling’s Late Return to Kant.” In Rethinking Kant, Volume 4, edited by Pablo Muchnik and Oliver Thorndike, pp. 75–93. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
———, 2018. “Skepticism, Deduction, and Reason’s Maturation.” In Skepticism: Historical and Contemporary Inquiries, edited by G. Anthony Bruno and A. C. Rutherford, pp. 203–19. London: Routledge.
———, 2020. “Schelling’s Philosophical Letters on Doctrine and Critique.” In Critique in German Philosophy: From Kant to Critical Theory, edited by María del Rosario Acosta López and J. Colin McQuillan, p. 133–54. Albany: SUNY Press.
Cavell, Stanley, 1976. Must We Mean What We Say?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———, 1981. The Senses of Walden: An Expanded Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———, 1988. In Quest of the Ordinary: Lines of Skepticism and Romanticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———, 1996. Contesting Tears: The Hollywood Melodrama of the Unknown Woman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———, 1999. The Claim of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Conant, James, 2004. “Varieties of Skepticism.” In Wittgenstein and Skepticism, edited by Denis McManus, pp. 97–136. London: Routledge.
Crary, Alice and Sanford Shieh, eds.. Reading Cavell. London: Routledge.
Fichte, J. G., 1994. Introductions to the Wissenshcaftslehre, edited and translated by Daniel Breazeale. Indiannapolis: Hackett.
———, 2000. Foundations of Natural Right, edited by Michael Baur. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Forster, Michael, 1989. Hegel and Skepticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———, 2014. “Schelling and Skepticism.” In Ostaric (2014), pp. 32–47.
Franks, Paul, 2005. All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments and Skepticism in German Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———, 2006. “The Discovery of the Other: Cavell, Fichte, and Skepticism.” In Crary and Shieh (2006), pp. 166–203.
———, 2014. “Skepticism After Kant.” In Varieties of Skepticism: Essays after Kant, Wittgenstein, and Cavell, edited by James Conant and Andrea Kern, pp. 19–58. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Gabriel, Markus, 2009. “The Mythological Being of Reflection: An Essay on Hegel, Schelling and the Contingency of Necessity.” In Mythology, Madness, and Laughter, edited by Markus Gabriel and Slavoj Žižek, pp. 15–94. New York: Continuum.
Gutschmidt, Rico, 2016. “Skepticism, Metaphors, and Vertigo: Wittgenstein and Cavell on the Human Condition.” Wittgenstein-Studien 7(1): 131–47.
Hegel, G. W. F., 1975. Hegel’s Logic, translated by W. Wallace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———, 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit, translated by A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———, 1991. The Encyclopedia Logic (with the Zusätze), edited by T. F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting and H. S. Harris. Indianapolis: Hackett.
———, 1995. Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Vol. 2, edited by E. S. Haldane and F. H. Simson. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
———, 2000. “On the Relation of Skepticism to Philosophy.” In Between Kant and Hegel: Texts in the Development of Post-Kantian Idealism, edited by George di Giovanni and H. S. Harris, pp. 311–62. Indianapolis: Hackett.
———, 2004. Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature, translated by A. V. Miller. Oxford: Clarendon.
———, 2010. The Science of Logic, edited by George di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heidegger, Martin, 1996. Being and Time, translated by Joan Stambaugh. Albany: SUNY Press.
Houlgate, Stephen, 2006. The Opening of Hegel’s Logic: From Being to Infinity. Indiana: Purdue University Press.
———, 2015. “Is Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit an Essay in Transcendental Argument?” In The Transcendental Turn, edited by Sebastian Gardner and Matthew Grist, pp. 173–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kant, Immanuel, 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———, 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment, edited by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———, 2002. “Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics.” In Theoretical Philosophy After 1781, edited by Henry Allison, Michael Friedman, Gary Hatfield and Peter Heath, pp. 29–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lear, Jonathan, 2006. Radical Hope: Ethics in the Face of Cultural Devastation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Macarthur, David, 2014. “Cavell on Skepticism and the Importance of Not-Knowing.” Conversations: The Journal of Cavellian Studies 2: 1–23.
———, 2018. “Wittgenstein’s Liberal Naturalism of Human Nature.” In Wittgenstein and Naturalism, edited by Kevin M. Cahill and Thomas Raleigh, pp. 33–55. London: Routledge.
Maimon, Salomon, 2010. Essay on Transcendental Philosophy, translated by Alistair Welchman, Nick Midgley, Merten Reglitz and Henry Somers-Hall. London: Continuum.
McDowell, John, 1996. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———, 1998a. “Virtue and Reason.” In Mind, Value, and Reality, pp. 50–73. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———, 1998b. “Non-Cognitivism and Rule-Following.” In Mind, Value, and Reality, pp. 198–218. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nagel, Thomas, 1971. “The Absurd.” Journal of Philosophy 68(20): 716–27.
Nietzsche, Friedrich, 1997. Daybreak: Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality, edited by R. J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———, 2002. Beyond Good and Evil, translated by Judith Norman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———, 2006. On the Genealogy of Morality, translated by Carol Diethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, Andrew, 2018. “Skepticism and Critique in Arendt and Cavell.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 44(1): 81–99.
Ostaric, Lara, 2014. Interpreting Schelling: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, Hilary, 2006. “Philosophy as the Education of Grownups: Stanley Cavell and Skepticism.” In Crary and Shieh (2006), pp. 119–30.
Reinhold, K. L., 2000. “The Foundation of Philosophical Knowledge.” In Between Kant and Hegel: Texts in the Development of Post-Kantian Idealism, edited by George di Giovanni and H. S. Harris, pp. 51–103. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Rödl, Sebastian, 2018. Self-Consciousness and Objectivity: An Introduction to Absolute Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schelling, F. W. J., 1861. Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schellings sämmtliche Werke, edited by K. F. A. Schelling. Stuttgart: Cotta.
———, 1980. The Unconditioned in Human Knowledge: Four Early Essays 1794–1796, edited by Fritz Marti. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.
Shieh, Sanford, 2006. “The Truth of Skepticism.” In Crary and Shieh (2006), pp. 131–65.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1969. On Certainty, edited by D. Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe. London: Blackwell.
———, 2009. Philosophical Investigations, edited by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker and J. Schulte. London: Blackwell.
The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.