Wittgenstein and Folk Psychology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v9i4.4685Abstract
Various writings by the later Wittgenstein on the philosophy of psychology, published posthumously, express his basic critical attitude toward certain concepts and issues in the philosophy of psychology. His attitude towards folk psychology is negative in principle, leaving him opposed to the foundation of current psychological research. This critique of folk psychology and of the philosophy of psychology in general is in accord with the general method of his later philosophy, that is, dealing with philosophical problems by dissolving them. However, his critical attitude towards folk psychology has been less influential in the development of contemporary philosophy, and is in opposition to the philosophy of psychology and folk psychology as practiced today. In this paper I will analyze Wittgenstein's understanding of the concept of psychology, offering a different interpretation from that of other scholars, and explain why and how contemporary philosophers of psychology misunderstand Wittgenstein.
References
Bennett, Maxwell and Peter Hacker, 2003. Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell.
Benjafield, John G., 2008. “Revisiting Wittgenstein On Kohler and Gestalt Psychology.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Science. 44(2): 99–118.
Bermúdez, José Luis, 2005. Philosophy of Psychology: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge.
Bloor, David, 1999. “Wittgenstein’s Behaviorism.” In The Handbook of Behaviorism, edited by William O’Donohue and Richard F. Kitchener, pp. 329–60. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic Press.
Cook, John W., 1994. Wittgenstein’s Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldman, A. and K. Mason, 2007. “Simulation.” In Thagard (2007), pp. 267–93.
Hacker, Peter, 1996. Wittgenstein’s Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Luckhardt, C. Grand, 1983. “Wittgenstein and Behaviorism.” Synthese 56: 319–38.
Miller, Ronald, 2015. Not So Abnormal Psychology: A Pragmatic View of Mental Illness. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Margolis, Joseph, 1984. Philosophy of Psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Neisser, U., 1967. Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Overgard, Soren, 2013. Wittgenstein and Other Minds: Rethinking Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity with Wittgenstein, Levinas, and Husserl. London: Routledge.
Racine, Timothy P. and Ulrich Müller, 2009. “The Contemporary Relevance of Wittgenstein: Reflections and Directions.” New Ideas in Psychology 27: 107–17.
Schulte, Joachim, 1995. Experience and Expression. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Stich, Stephen P., 1983. From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science, The Case Against Belief. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stich, S. and I. Ravenscroft, 1994. “What is Folk Psychology?” Cognition 50: 447–68.
Thagard, Paul, ed., 2007. Philosophy of Psychology and Cognitive Science. Amsterdam: North Holland/Elsevier.
Thornton, Tim, 2009. “On the interface problem in philosophy and psychiatry.” In Psychiatry as Cognitive Neuroscience: Philosophical Perspectives, edited by Matthew Broome and Lisa Bortolotti, pp. 120–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tu, Jiliang, 2005. A Study of Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy. Nanjing: Jiangsu People’s Press.
Wang, Xiaosheng and Shiping Guo, 2004. A Study of the Later Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Psychology. Beijing: China Social Science Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1967. Zettel, edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright, translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Estimated date of origin of the manuscript (in German Language) [1929–48].
———, 1974. Philosophical Grammar, edited by Rush Rhees, translated by Anthony Kenny. Oxford: Blackwell. Estimated date or origin of the manuscript (in German Language) [1933].
———, 1980a. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology: Vol. I., edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright, translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Estimated date of origin of the manuscript (in German Language) [1947].
———, 1980b. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology: Vol. II., edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright, translated by C. G. Luckhardt and M. A. E. Aue. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Estimated date of origin of the manuscript (in German Language) [1948].
———, 1991. Philosophical Remarks, edited by Rush Rhees, translated by Raymond Hargreaves and Maximilian A. E. Aue. Oxford: Blackwell. Estimated date of origin of the manuscript (in German Language) [1930].
———, 1992. Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. II., edited by G. H. von Wright and Heikki Nyman, translated by C. G. Luckhardt and Maximilian A. E. Aue. Oxford: Blackwell. Estimated date of origin of the manuscript (in German Language) [1949–51].
———, 2009. Philosophische Untersuchungen / Philosophical Investigations, Revised fourth edition, edited by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. First published in 1953.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
