Philosophical Concepts, the Ideal of Sublimation, and the “Unpredictability of Human Behaviour”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v9i4.4684Abstract
Wittgenstein famously criticizes the philosophical practice of analyzing the meaning of words outside their ordinary use in everyday language, whereby often self-made pseudo-problems arise. In order to shed further light on Wittgenstein’s critique, this article makes use of the Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology. First, starting from the remark in Vol. I, §52, his criticism of the philosophical method of selection and generalization is explained in detail. Next, I give a brief outline of Wittgenstein’s own way of philosophizing by reference to a selection of comments concerning the use of psychological words in everyday language, which will also further elucidate his critique. Finally, I enter into the question which (kind of) significance everyday language according to Wittgenstein has for philosophy.
References
Hacker, Peter M. S., 2013. “Prologue: Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Psychology as a Critical Instrument for the Psychological Sciences.” In Racine and Slaney (2013), pp. 10–27.
Kuusela, Oskari, 2013. “Wittgenstein’s Method of Conceptual Investigation and Concept Formation in Psychology.” In Racine and Slaney (2013), pp. 51–71.
Racine, Timothy P. and Kathleen L. Slaney, eds., 2013. A Wittgensteinian Perspective on the Use of Conceptual Analysis in Psychology. London: Palgrave.
ter Hark, Michel, 2000. “Uncertainty, Vagueness and Psychological Indeterminancy.” Synthese 124: 193–220.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1979. “The Yellow Book (Selected Parts).” In Wittgenstein’s Lectures Cambridge 1932-1935, edited by Alice Ambrose, pp. 41–77. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
———, 1980a. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology: Vol. I., edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Estimated date of origin of the manuscript (in German Language) [1947].
———, 1980b. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology: Vol. II., edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright. Translated by C. G. Luckhardt and M. A. E. Aue. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Estimated date of origin of the manuscript (in German Language) [1948].
———, 1992. Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology: Vol. I., edited by G. H. von Wright and Heikki Nyman. Translated by C. G. Luckhardt and Maximilian A. E. Aue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Estimated date of origin of the manuscript (in German Language) [1948-49].
———, 2009. Philosophische Untersuchungen / Philosophical Investigations, Revised fourth edition, translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. First published in 1953.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
