Huaping Lu-Adler, Kant and the Science of Logic
Reviewed by Tyke Nunez.
Buroker, Jill Vance, 2019. “Review of Kant and the Science of Logic: A Historical and Philosophical Reconstruction, by Huaping Lu-Adler.” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2019.03.24. https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/kant-and-the-science-of-logic-a-historical-and-philosophical-reconstruction/.
Goldfarb, Warren, 2001. “Frege’s Conception of Logic.” In Future Pasts: The Analytic Tradition in Twentieth-Century Philosophy, edited by Juliet Floyd and Sanford Shieh, pp. 25–41. New York: Oxford University Press.
Heis, Jeremy, 2020. “Kant on Parallel Lines: Definitions, Postulates, and Axioms.” In Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics, volume 1: The Critical Philosophy and its Roots, edited by Carl Posy and Ofra Rechter, pp. 157–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ingensiep, Hans Werner, 1994. “Die biologischen Analogien und die erkenntnistheoretischen Alternativen in Kants Kritik der Reinen Vernunft B§27.” Kant-Studien 85: 381–93.
Kant, Immanuel, 1979. Gesammelte Schriften. 29 vols.. Berlin: de Gruyter.
———, 1999. Critique of Pure Reason. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———, 2004. Lectures on Logic. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kim, Hyoung Sung, 2019. “Review of Kant and the Science of Logic: A Historical and Philosophical Reconstruction, by Huaping Lu-Adler.” Kantian Review 24: 663–68.
Lu-Adler, Huaping, 2012. Kant’s Conception of Logical Extension and Its Implications. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Davis.
Lu-Adler, Huaping, 2015a. “Epigenesis of Pure Reason and the Source of Pure Cognitions: How Kant Is No Nativist about Logical Cognition.” In Rethinking Kant, volume 5, edited by Pablo Muchnik and Oliver Thorndike, pp. 35–70. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
———, 2015b. “Constructing a Demonstration of Logical Rules, or How to Use Kant’s Logic Corpus.” In Reading Kant’s Lectures, edited by Robert R. Clewis, pp. 137–58. Berlin: de Gruyter.
———, 2016. “Kant on Proving Aristotle’s Logic as Complete.” Kantian Review 21: 1–26.
MacFarlane, John, 2000. What Does It Mean to Say That Logic is Formal?. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pittsburgh.
———, 2002. “Frege, Kant, and the Logic in Logicism.” Philosophical Review 111: 25–65.
Mensch, Jennifer, 2013. Kant’s Organicism: Epigenesis and the Development of Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merritt, Melissa, 2019. “Review of Kant and the Science of Logic: A Historical and Philosophical Reconstruction, by Huaping Lu-Adler.” Philosophy Now: a Magazine of Ideas 132: 46–47.
Nunez, Tyke, 2014. “Definitions of Kant’s Categories.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44: 631–57.
———, 2019. “Logical Mistakes, Logical Aliens, and the Laws of Kant’s pure general Logic.” Mind 128: 1149–80.
———, Ms. “The Formality of Kant’s Logic and Consciousness of Logical Laws”. Manuscript.
Reich, Klaus, 1992. The Completeness of Kant’s Table of Judgments, translated by Jane Kneller and Michael Losonsky. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rosenkoetter, Timothy, 2020. “Review of Kant and the Science of Logic: A Historical and Philosophical Reconstruction, by Huaping Lu-Adler.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 58: 618–19.
Sloan, Phillip R., 2002. “Performing the Categories: Eighteenth-Century Generation Theory and the Biological Roots of Kant’s a priori.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40: 229–53.
Tonelli, Giorgio, 1994. Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason Within the Tradition of Modern Logic: A Commentary on its History. Hildesheim: Olms.
Tolley, Clinton, 2012. “The Generality of Kant’s Transcendental Logic.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 50: 417–46.
Wilson, Kirk Dallas, 1972. The Logical Grammar of Kant’s Twelve Forms of Judgment: A Formalized Study of Kant’s Table of Judgments. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.