Epistemic Realism in Bradley and Early Moore
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v9i6.4294Abstract
In this paper I attempt to show how Moore’s early emancipation from Bradley’s absolute idealism presupposes a fundamental adherence to certain theses of absolute idealism itself. In particular, I argue that the idea of an immediate epistemic access to concepts and propositions that Moore endorses in his platonic atomism (Hylton) is a reworking of a form of epistemic realism already present in Bradley. Epistemic realism is the conjunction of two theses: i) reality is independent of any constructive work of the human mind; ii) reality is immediately (non-discursively) accessible to knowledge. In this paper I first focus on Moore’s early idealist phase (1897), suggesting that it should be understood as an attempt at isolating this thesis in Bradley against Kant’s transcendental idealism. I then suggest that it is on the background of an invariant adherence to it that we should understand Moore’s later rejection of monism and idealism (1898–9) through his anti-psychologism. I hence explore how epistemic realism is at work in Moore’s platonic atomism and conclude with some remarks about the further significance of Moore’s rejection of Kant.
References
Baldwin, Thomas, 2008. G. E. Moore. New York: Routledge.
Bradley, Francis Herbert, 1883. The Principles of Logic. London: Oxford University Press.
———, 1893a. Appearance and Reality. A Metaphysical Essay, Elibron Classics. Adamant Media Corporation.
———, 1893b. “Consciousness and Experience.” Mind 6: 211–16.
———, 1909. “On our Knowledge of Immediate Experience.” Mind 18(69): 40–64.
Candlish, Stewart, 2007. The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twentieth Century Philosophy. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
Frege, Gottlob, 1892. “Über Sinn und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100: 25-–50. Translated as “On Sense and Reference.” In Translations From the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, edited and translated by Peter Geach and Max Black (1980), pp. 56-–78
———, 1918. “Der Gedanke. Eine Logische Untersuchung.” Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus I (1918—1919): 58-–77. Translated as “The Thought: A Logical Inquiry.” Mind 259: 289–311.
Hylton, Peter, 1990. Russell, Idealism and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mander, W. J, 1994. An Introduction to Bradley’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Moore, George Edward, 1897a. “In What Sense, If Any, Do Past and Future Time Exist?” Mind 6: 235–40.
———, 1897b. “Review of La Modalité du Jugement. by Léon Brunschvicg.” Mind 6(24): 554–59.
———, 1898. “Freedom.” Mind 7: 179–204.
———, 1899. “The Nature of Judgement.” Mind 8: 176–93.
———, 1900. “Necessity.” Mind 9: 289–304.
———, 1901. “Identity.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1: 103–27.
———, 1902. “Experience and Empiricism.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 3: 80–95.
———, 1902b. “Truth.” In Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, edited by J. Baldwin, pp. 1901–2. London: Macmillan.
———, 1903. “The Refutation of Idealism.” Mind 12: 433–53.
———, 1919–20. “External and Internal Relations.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 20: 40–62.
———, 1942. “An Autobiography.” In The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, edited by P. A. Schilpp. La Salle: Open Court.
———, 1993. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———, 2011. Early Philosophical Writings, edited by Thomas Baldwin and Consuelo Preti. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Preti, Consuelo, 2008. “On the Origins of the Contemporary Notion of Propositional Content: Anti-psychologism in Nineteenth-century Psychology and G. E. Moore’s Early Theory of Judgement.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part A 39(2): 176–85.
Russell, Bertrand, 1907. “On the Nature of Truth.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 7(1): 28–49.
Sellars, Wilfrid, 1997. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
