Please be advised that the journal will be unavailable for 30 minutes on Monday, July 26, 2021, starting at 9:30 AM EST. This downtime is scheduled for necessary upgrades. We apologize for the inconvenience that this may cause.

Sellars, Price, and the Myth of the Given

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v8i7.4270

Abstract

Wilfrid Sellars's "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind" (EPM) begins with an argument against sense-datum epistemology. There is some question about the validity of this attack, stemming in part from the assumption that Sellars is concerned with epistemic foundationalism. This paper recontextualizes Sellars's argument in two ways: by showing how the argument of EPM relates to Sellars's 1940s work, which does not concern foundationalism at all; and by considering the view of H.H. Price, Sellars's teacher at Oxford and the only classical datum theorist to receive substantive comment in EPM. Timm Triplett has claimed that Sellars's discussion simply begs the question against Price, but this depends on the mistaken assumption that Sellars's concern is with foundationalism.  On the contrary, Sellars's argument concerns the assumption that the innate capacity for sensory experience counts as "thinking in presence" in the way needed for empiricist accounts of content acquisition. Price's distinction between noticing universals and being aware of them encapsulates the tensions empiricists face here.

Author Biography

Michael R. Hicks, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio

Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy

References

Brandhoff, Boris, 2017. “Pure Pragmatics and the Idea of a Metatheoretical Functionalism.” In Pereplyotchik and Barnbaum (2017), pp. 55–66.

Chalmers, David, 2003. “The Content and Epistemology of Phenomenal Belief.” In Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives, edited by Quentin Smith and Aleksandar Jokic, pp. 220–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

deVries, Willem A., ed., 2009. Empiricism, Perceptual Knowledge, Normativity, and Realism: Essays on Wilfrid Sellars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

deVries, Willem A. and Timm Triplett, 2000. Knowledge, Mind, and the Given: Reading Wilfrid Sellars’s “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind”. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

Hicks, Michael, 2017. “What Jones Taught the Ryleans: Towards a Sellarsian Metaphysics of Thought.” In Pereplyotchik and Barnbaum (2017), pp. 67–83.

———, forthcoming. “Wilfrid Sellars and the task of philosophy.” Synthese. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-020-02646-8

Klemick, Griffin, forthcoming. “C. I. Lewis was a Foundationalist After All.” History of Philosophy Quarterly.

Kukla, Rebecca, 2000. “Myth, Memory and Misrecognition in Sellars’ “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind”.” Philosophical Studies 101: 161–211.

Macbeth, Danielle, 2017. “Natural Truth.” In Pereplyotchik and Barnbaum (2017), pp. 172–82.

———, 2018. “Sellars and Frege on Concepts and Laws.” In Sellars and the History of Modern Philosophy, edited by Luca Corti and Antonio M. Nunziante, pp. 138–56. New York: Routledge.

McDowell, John, 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

———, 1998. “Sellars on Perceptual Experience.” In Having the World in View, pp. 3–22. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2009.

O’Shea, James, 2007. Wilfrid Sellars: Naturalism With a Normative Turn. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Olen, Peter, 2016. Wilfrid Sellars and the Foundations of Normativity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Pereplyotchik, David and Deborah R. Barnbaum, eds., 2017. Sellars and Contemporary Philosophy. New York: Routledge.

Price, H. H., 1932. Perception. London: Methuen and Co. Second, revised edition, 1951.

———, 1940. Hume’s Theory of the External World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

———, 1953. Thinking and Experience. London: Hutchinson University Library. Second edition, 1969.

———, 1959. “Comment on: ‘Price’s Theory of the Concept’.” The Review of Metaphysics 12: 481–85.

Russell, Bertrand, 1912. The Problems of Philosophy. London: Williams and Norgate.

Sachs, Carl, 2014. Intentionality and the Myths of the Given: Between Pragmatism and Phenomenology. New York: Pickering & Chatto.

Sellars, Wilfrid, [AD ] 1949. “Acquaintance and Description Again.” Journal of Philosophy 46: 496–504.

———, [AR] 1975. “Autobiographical Reflections.” In Action, Knowledge, and Reality: Critical Studies in Honor of Wilfrid Sellars, edited by Hector-Neri Castañeda, pp. 277–93. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.

———, [ENWW ] 1947. “Epistemology and the New Way of Words.” Reprinted in Sellars (1980), pp. 31–46.

———, [EPM ] 1956. “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind.” Reprinted in Sellars (1963), pp. 127–96.

———, [LRB ] 1950. “Language, Rules and Behavior.” Reprinted in Sellars (1980), pp. 129–55.

———, [OPM ] 1974. “Ontology and the Philosophy of Mind in Russell.” In Bertrand Russell’s Philosophy, edited by George Nakhnikian, pp. 57–100. London: Duckworth.

———, [P ] 1952. “Particulars.” Reprinted in Sellars (1963), pp. 282–97.

———, [PH ] 1963. “Phenomenalism.” In Sellars (1963), pp. 60–105.

———, [PPE ] 1947. “Pure Pragmatics and Epistemology.” Reprinted in Sellars (1980), pp. 53–85.

———, [PSIM ] 1962. “Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man.” Reprinted in Sellars (1963), pp. 1–40.

———, [RNWW ] 1948. “Realism and the New Way of Words.” Reprinted in Sellars (1980), pp. 53–85.

———, [SPR] 1963. Science, Perception and Reality. Atascadero, Cal.: Ridgeview.

———, 1980. Pure Pragmatics and Possible Worlds: The Early Essays of Wilfrid Sellars, edited by Jeffrey Sicha. Atascadero, Cal.: Ridgeview.

Snowdon, Paul, 2009. “Some Sellarsian Myths.” In deVries (2009), pp. 101–30.

Stebbing, L. S., 1932. “The Method of Analysis in Metaphysics.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 33: 65–94.

Triplett, Timm, 2014. “Sellars’s Misconstrual of the Defenders of the Given.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 31: 79–99.

Tripodi, Paolo, 2011. “Revisiting the Myth of Jones: Sellars and Behaviorism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 28: 85–105.

Williams, Michael, 2009. “The Tortoise and the Serpent: Sellars on the Structure of Empirical Knowledge.” In deVries (2009), pp. 147–85.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-10