Resolute Readings of Wittgenstein and Nonsense
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v8i10.4190Abstract
The aim of this paper is to show that a corollary of resolute readings of Wittgenstein’s conception of nonsense cannot be sustained. First, I describe the corollary. Next, I point out the relevance to it of Wittgenstein’s discussion of family resemblance concepts. Then, I survey some typical uses of nonsense to see what they bring to an ordinary language treatment of the word “nonsense” and its relatives. I will subsequently consider the objection, on behalf of a resolute reading, that “nonsense” is a term of philosophical criticism. Finally, I conclude that resolute readings have not sufficiently accounted for how nonsense behaves in our language; they have failed to heed Wittgenstein’s warning: “don’t think, but look!”
References
Bronzo, Silver, 2012. “The resolute reading and its critics: an introduction to the literature.” Wittgenstein-Studien 3: 45–80.
Carroll, Lewis, 1994. “Jabberwocky.” In The Penguin Book of Nonsense Verse, edited by Quinten Blake, pp. 35–37. London: Penguin.
———, 1998. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass. London: Penguin.
Conant, James, 1989. “Must we show what we cannot say?” In The Senses of Stanley Cavell, edited by Richard Fleming and Michael Payne, pp. 242–83. Lewisburg, Penn.: Bucknell University Press.
———, 1990a. “Introduction.” In Hilary Putnam. Realism with a Human Face, edited by James Conant, pp. xv–lxxiv. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
———, 1990b. “Throwing away the top of the ladder.” The Yale Review 79: 328–64.
———, 1992. “The search for logically alien thought: Descartes, Kant, Frege, and the Tractatus.” Philosophical Topics 20: 115–80.
———, 1993. “Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein, and nonsense.” In Pursuits of Reason: Essays in Honor of Stanley Cavell, edited by Ted Cohen, Paul Guyer and Hilary Putnam, pp. 195–224. Lubbock, Tex.: Texas Tech University Press.
———, 1994. “Introduction.” In Words and Life, edited by Hilary Putnam and James Conant, pp. xi–lxxvi. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
———, 2000. “Elucidation and nonsense in Frege and early Wittgenstein.” In Crary and Read (2000), pp. 174–214.
———, 2001a. “A prolegomenon to the reading of the later Wittgenstein.” In The Legacy of Wittgenstein: Pragmatism or Deconstruction, edited by Ludwig Nagl and Chantal Mouffe, pp. 93–130. Berlin: Peter Lang.
———, 2001b. “Biography and philosophy.” In Wittgenstein: Biography and Philosophy, edited by James Klagge, pp. 16–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———, 2001c. “Two conceptions of Die Überwindung der Metaphysik : Carnap and early Wittgenstein.” In Wittgenstein in America, edited by Timothy McCarthy and Stephen Stidd, pp. 13–61. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———, 2002a. “On going the bloody hard way in philosophy.” In The Possibilities of Sense: Essays in Honour of D. Z. Phillips, edited by John H. Whittaker, pp. 85–129. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
———, 2002b. “The method of the Tractatus.” In From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy, edited by Erich H. Reck, pp. 374–462. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———, 2007. “Mild mono-Wittgensteinianism.” In Wittgenstein and the Moral Life: Essays in Honor of Cora Diamond, edited by Alice Crary, pp. 31–142. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Conant, James and Silver Bronzo, 2017. “Resolute readings of the Tractatus.” In A Companion to Wittgenstein, edited by Hans-Johann Glock and John Hyman, pp. 175–94. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Conant, James and Edmund Dain, 2011. “Throwing the baby out: a reply to Roger White.” In Read and Lavery (2011), pp. 66–83.
Conant, James and Cora Diamond, 2004. “On reading the Tractatus esolutely: Reply to Meredith Williams and Peter Sullivan.” In Wittgenstein’s Lasting Significance, edited by Max Kölbel and Bernhard Weiss, pp. 46–99. London: Routledge.
Crary, Alice and Rupert Read, eds., 2000. The New Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.
Dain, Edmund, 2008. “Wittgenstein, contextualism, and nonsense: a reply to Hans-Johann Glock.” Journal of Philosophical Research 51: 143–68.
Derrida, Jacques, 1988. Limited, Inc. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
Diamond, Cora, 1991a. “Introduction II: Wittgenstein and metaphysics.” In Diamond (1991f), pp. 13–38.
———, 1991b. “Realism and the realistic spirit.” In Diamond (1991f), pp. 39–72.
———, 1991c. “What nonsense might be.” In Diamond (1991f), pp. 95–114.
———, 1991d. “Throwing away the ladder: how to read the Tractatus.” In Diamond (1991f), pp. 179–204.
———, 1991e. “Riddles and Anselm’s riddle.” In Diamond (1991f), pp. 267–89.
———, 1991f. The Realistic Spirit. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
———, 2000. “Ethics, imagination and the method of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.” In Crary and Read (2000), pp. 149–73.
Dick, Philip K., 2012a. A Maze of Truth. New York: Mariner Books.
———, 2012b. The Penultimate Truth. New York: Mariner Books.
———, 2012c. Ubik. New York: Mariner Books.
Floyd, Juliet, 1998. “The uncaptive eye: Solipsism in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.” In Loneliness, edited by Louis Rouner, pp. 79–108. South Bend, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
Glock, Hans-Johann, 2004. “All kinds of nonsense.” In Wittgenstein at Work: method in the Philosophical Investigations, edited by Erich Ammereller and Eugen Fischer, pp. 221–45. London: Routledge.
Goldfarb, Warren, 1997. “Metaphysics and nonsense: on Cora Diamond’s The Realistic Spirit.” Journal of Philosophical Research 22: 57–73.
———, 2011. “Das Überwinden: anti-metaphysical readings of the Tractatus.” In Read and Lavery (2011), pp. 6–21.
Goodman, Nelson, 1968. Languages of Art: An approach to a theory of symbols. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
Grice, H. Paul, 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Hacker, P. M. S., 1972. Insight and Illusion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———, 2000. “Was he trying to whistle it?” In Crary and Read (2000), pp. 353–88.
———, 2003. “Wittgenstein, Carnap, and the new American Wittgenstein.” Philosophical Quarterly 53: 1–23.
Hagberg, Garry, 2008. Describing Ourselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hutchinson, Phil, 2007. “What’s the point of elucidation?” Metaphilosophy 38: 691–713.
Ishiguro, Hide, 1969. “Use and reference of names.” In Studies in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein, edited by Peter Winch, pp. 20–50. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Jarry, Alfred, 2003. Ubu Roi, ou les Polonaise, reprint edition. New York: Dover.
Koethe, John, 1996. The Continuity of Wittgenstein’s Thought. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Lear, Edward, 1992. A Book of Nonsense, reprint edition. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
McGuinness, Brian, 1981. “The so-called realism of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.” In Perspectives on the Philosophy of Wittgenstein, edited by Ian Black, pp. 60–74. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Mulhall, Stephen, 2007. Wittgenstein’s Private Language: Grammar, Nonsense, and Imagination in Philosophical Investigations, §§243–315. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pinker, Steven, 2003. The Blank Slate: The modern denial of human nature. London: Penguin.
Read, Rupert, 2006. “A No-Theory? Against Hutto on Wittgenstein.” Philosophical Investigations 29: 73–81.
Read, Rupert and Rob Deans, 2003. “ “Nothing is Shown”: A ‘Resolute’ Response to Mounce, Emiliani, Koethe, and Vilhauer.” Philosophical Investigations 26: 239–68.
———, 2011. “The possibility of a resolutely resolute reading of the Tractatus.” In Read and Lavery (2011), pp. 149–71.
Read, Rupert and Matthew Lavery, eds., 2011. Beyond the Tractatus Wars. London: Routledge.
Rhees, Rush, ed., 1981. Ludwig Wittgenstein: Personal Recollections. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ricketts, Thomas, 1996. “Pictures, logic and the limits of sense in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.” In The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein, edited by Hans Sluga and David Stern, pp. 59–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schroeder, Severin, 2006. Wittgenstein: the way out of the fly-bottle. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Seuss, Dr, 1937. And To Think That I Saw It On Mulberry Street. New York: Vanguard Press Books.
Stern, David, 2006. “How many Wittgensteins?” In Wittgenstein: The Philosopher and His Work, edited by Alois Pichler and Simo Säätelä, pp. 205–29. Frankfurt a.M.: Ontos Verlag.
Winch, Peter, 1987. “Language, thought and world in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.” In Trying to Make Sense, pp. 3–17. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1922 [1999]. Tractatus logico-philosophicus, edited by C. K. Ogden. London: Routledge.
———, 1953. Philosophical Investigations, edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and Rush Rhees. Oxford: Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
