Transfinite Number in Wittgenstein's Tractatus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v9i2.4029Abstract
In his highly perceptive, if underappreciated introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, Russell identifies a “lacuna” within Wittgenstein’s theory of number, relating specifically to the topic of transfinite number. The goal of this paper is two-fold. The first is to show that Russell’s concerns cannot be dismissed on the grounds that they are external to the Tractarian project, deriving, perhaps, from logicist ambitions harbored by Russell but not shared by Wittgenstein. The extensibility of Wittgenstein’s theory of number to the case of transfinite cardinalities is, I shall argue, a desideratum generated by concerns intrinsic, and internal to Wittgenstein’s logical and semantic framework. Second, I aim to show that Wittgenstein’s theory of number as espoused in the Tractatus is consistent with Russell’s assessment, in that Wittgenstein meant to leave open the possibility that transfinite numbers could be generated within his system, but did not show explicitly how to construct them. To that end, I show how one could construct a transfinite number line using ingredients inherent in Wittgenstein’s system, and in accordance with his more general theories of number and of operations.
References
Black, Max, 1964. A Companion to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bergmann, Merrie, James Moor and Jack Nelson, 2014. The Logic Book, Sixth Edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Bizarro, Sara, 2010. “A Hertzian Interpretation of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.” Eidos 13: 150–65.
Benacerraf, Paul and Hilary Putnam, eds., 1983. In Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings, Second Edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Benacerraf, Paul, 1965. “What Numbers Could not Be.” In Benacerraf and Putnam (1983), pp. 272–94.
Bernays, Paul, 1935. “On Platonism in Mathematics.” In Benacerraf and Putnam (1983), pp. 258–71.
Bostock, David, 2012. Russell’s Logical Atomism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Brauldi, Richard A, 2009. Introductory Combinatorics, Fifth Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Burgess, John. P, 2008. “Cats, Dogs, and so on.” In Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, edited by Dean Zimmerman, pp. 4–56. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
William Ewald, 1996. From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics, Volume 2. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Cantor, Georg, 1891. “On an Elementary Question in the Theory of Manifolds.” In William Ewald (1996), pp. 920–22.
———, 1895/1995. Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers, edited by tr. P. E. B. Jourdain. New York, NY: Dover.
Connelly, James, 2015. Wittgenstein and Early Analytic Semantics: Toward a Phenomenology of Truth. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
———, 2017. “On Operator N and Wittgenstein’s Logical Philosophy.” Journal for the History of Analytic Philosophy 5(4): 1–26.
Church, Alonzo, 1936. “A Note on the Entscheidungsproblem.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 1: 40–41.
Dunham, Douglas, 2010. M. C. Escher’s Use of the Poincaré Models of Hyperbolic Geometry., http://www.math-art.eu/Documents/pdfs/Dunham.pdf, accessed August 2, 2020.
Eisenthal, Joshua, 2018. Models and Multiplicities: Logical Pictures in Hertz and Wittgenstein. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
Ferreirós, José, 2007. Labyrinth of Thought: A History of Set Theory and Its Role in Modern Mathematics, Second Revised Edition. Berlin: Birkhäuser Verlag.
———, 2011. “On Arbitrary Sets And ZFC.” The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 17(3): 361–93.
Fogelin, R. J., 1982. “Wittgenstein’s Operator N.” Analysis 42: 124–27.
———, 1987. Wittgenstein, Second Edition. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Frascolla, Pasquale, 1994. Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics. New York, NY: Routledge.
———, 1997. “The Tractatus System of Arithmetic.” Synthese 112: 353–78.
———, 2017. “Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy of Mathematics.” In A Companion to Wittgenstein: Blackwell Companions to Philosophy, edited by Hans-Johann Glock and John Hyman, pp. 305–18. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Geach, P. T., 1981. “Wittgenstein’s Operator N.” Analysis 41: 168–70.
———, 1982. “More on Wittgenstein’s Operator N.” Analysis 42: 127–28.
Hilbert, David, 1900. “From Mathematical Problems.” In William Ewald (1996), pp. 1096–105.
King, John and Desmond Lee, 1980. Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge 1930-32. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Koellner, Peter, 2016. The Continuum Hypothesis. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/continuum-hypothesis/.
Landini, Gregory, 2007. Wittgenstein’s Apprenticeship with Russell. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Check this.
Li, Jing, 2018. “The Hidden Set-Theoretical Paradox of the Tractatus.” Philosophia 46: 159–64.
McGray, James W., 2006. “The Power and the Limit of Wittgenstein’s N Operator.” History and Philosophy of Logic 27: 143–69.
Ramsey, Frank, 1923. “Review: Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.” Mind 32(128): 465–78
———, 1931. The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays. London, UK: Routledge and Keegan Paul.
Rodych, Victor, 2000. “Wittgenstein’s Critique of Set Theory.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 38(2): 281–319.
———, 2018. Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/wittgenstein-mathematics/.
Rogers, Brian and Kai F. Wehmeier, 2012. “Tractarian First-Order Logic: Identity and the N-Operator.” The Review of Symbolic Logic 5(4): 538–73.
Russell, Bertrand, 1919. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
Schroeder, Severin, 2006. Wittgenstein: The Way out of the Fly Bottle. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Soames, Scott, 1983. “Generality, Truth-Functions, and Expressive Capacity in the Tractatus.” The Philosophical Review 92(4): 573–89.
Steinhart, Eric, 2009. More Precisely: The Math You Need to do Philosophy. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.
Stern, David G., Brian Rogers and Gabriel Citron, eds., 2016. Wittgenstein Letures, Cambridge 1930-33: From the Notes of G. E. Moore. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1974. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, with an Introduction by Bertrand Russell, translated by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuiness. London and New York: Routledge.
———, 1978. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, Revised Edition, edited by G. E. M. Anscombe, Rush Rhees and G. H. von Wright. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
———, 1995. Cambridge Letters: Correspondence with Russell, Keynes, Moore, Ramsey, and Sraffa, edited by Brian McGuiness and G. H. von Wright. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
———, 2005. The Big Typescript: TS 213, German-English Scholar’s Edition, edited by C. Grant Luckhardt and Maximilian A. E. Aue. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
