Truth, Meaning, and Interpretation: A Reconsideration of Davidson’s Program

  • Arpy Khatchirian University of California Berkeley

Abstract

On a common reading of Davidson, the motivation for his proposal that a meaning theory is to take the form of a truth theory is at least partly guided by concern with the ends and means of interpretation. At the same time, the consensus seems to be that this proposal faces a particularly stubborn justificatory burden. The aim of this paper is twofold: first, to suggest that there is a promising route to discharging this burden, albeit one that is visible only once we shift our attention away from the so-called ‘problem of interpretation’; second, to make the case that, contrary to initial appearances, the line of justification offered here gives us a plausible interpretation of Davidson’s own goals. 

Author Biography

Arpy Khatchirian, University of California Berkeley
Lecturer, Department of Philosophy, UC Berkeley

References

Davidson, Donald, 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—, 1990. ‘The Structure and Content of Truth.’ The Journal of Philosophy 87: 279–328.

—, 1999. ‘Reply to Peter Pagin.’ In Donald Davidson: Truth, Meaning, and Knowledge, edited by U. Zeglen, pp. 68–70. London: Routledge.

—, 2001. Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—, 2005a. Truth and Predication. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

—, 2005b. Truth, Language and History. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Davies, Martin, 1987. ‘Tacit Knowledge and Semantic Theory: Can a Five Per Cent Difference Matter?’ Mind 96: 441–62.

Evans, Gareth, 1981. ‘Semantic Theory and Tacit Knowledge.’ In Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule, edited by S. Holtzman and C. Leich, pp. 118–40. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Foster, John A., 1976. ‘Meaning and Truth Theory.’ In Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics, edited by G. Evans and J. Mc- Dowell, pp. 1–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heck, Richard, 2006. ‘Reason and Language.’ In McDowell and His Critics, edited by C. Macdonald and G. Macdonald, pp. 22–45. Oxford: Blackwell.

—, 2007. ‘Meaning and Truth-Conditions.’ In Truth and Speech Acts: Studies in the Philosophy of Language, edited by D. Greimann and G. Siegwart, pp. 349–76. London: Routledge.

Higginbotham, James, 1989. ‘Knowledge of Reference.’ In Reflections on Chomsky, edited by A. George, pp. 153–74. Oxford: Blackwell.

—, 1992. ‘Truth and Understanding.’ Philosophical Studies 65: 3–16.

Kölbel, Max, 2001. ‘Two Dogmas of Davidsonian Semantics.’ The Journal of Philosophy 98: 613–35.

Larson, Richard and Gabriel Segal, 1995. Knowledge of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantic Theory. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.

Lepore, Ernest, 1983. ‘What Model Theoretic Semantics Cannot Do?’ Synthese 54: 167–87.

—, 1997. ‘Conditions on Understanding Language.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society n. s. 97: 41–60.

Lepore, Ernest and Kirk Ludwig, 2005. Donald Davidson: Meaning, Truth, Language, and Reality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

—, 2011. ‘Truth and Meaning Redux.’ Philosophical Studies 154: 251–77.

McDowell, John, 1998. Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Quine, W. V., 1981. Theories and Things. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

Ramberg, Bjørn, 1989. Donald Davidson’s Philosophy of Language: an Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

Rumfitt, Ian, 1995. ‘Truth-Conditions and Communication.’ Mind 104: 827–62.

Smith, Barry, 1992. ‘Understanding Language.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society n.s. 92: 109–41.

Soames, Scott, 2008. ‘Truth and Meaning—In Perspective.’ Midwest Studies in Philosophy 32: 1–19.

Tarski, Alfred, 1944. ‘The Semantic Conception of Truth.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4: 341–75.

—, 1956. ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages,’ translated by J. H. Woodger. In Logic, Semantics, and Metamathematics, pp. 152–278. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Williams, Michael, 1999. ‘Meaning and Deflationary Truth.’ The Journal of Philosophy 96: 545–64.
Published
2018-11-02