Susan Stebbing, Incomplete Symbols and Foundherentist Meta-Ontology

Frederique Janssen-Lauret

Abstract


Susan Stebbing’s work on incomplete symbols and analysis was instrumental in clarifying, sharpening, and improving the project of logical constructions which was pivotal to early analytic philosophy. She dispelled use-mention confusions by restricting the term ‘incomplete symbol’ to expressions eliminable through analysis, rather than those expressions’ purported referents, and distinguished linguistic analysis from analysis of facts. In this paper I explore Stebbing’s role in analytic philosophy’s development from anti-holism, presupposing that analysis terminates in simples, to the more holist or foundherentist analytic philosophy of the later 20th century. I read Stebbing as a transitional figure who made room for more holist analytic movements, e.g., applications of incomplete symbol theory to Quinean ontological commitment. Stebbing, I argue, is part of a historical narrative which starts with the holism of Bradley, an early influence on her, to which Moore and Russell’s logical analysis was a response. They countered Bradley’s holist reservations about facts with the view that the world is built up out of individually knowable simples. Stebbing, a more subtle and sympathetic reader of the British idealists, defends analysis, but with important refinements and caveats which prepared the way for a return to foundherentism and holism within analytic philosophy.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Beaney, Michael, 2003. ‘Susan Stebbing on Cambridge and Vienna Analysis.’ Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 10: 339–50.

———, 2016. ‘Susan Stebbing and the Early Reception of Logical Empiricism in Britain.’ Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 18: 233–56.

Birnberg, Ariadne, 2015. ‘Most Beautiful Maynard’. https://www.academia.edu/12545603/, accessed 18 January 2017.

Bradley, F. H., 1926 [1883]. The Principles of Logic, corrected impression. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, 1897. Appearance and Reality. London: Allen & Unwin.

Bronstein, Eugene, 1934. ‘Miss Stebbing’s Directional Analysis and Basic Facts.’ Analysis 2: 10–14.

Chapman, Siobhan, 2013. Susan Stebbing and the Language of Common Sense. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Haack, Susan, 1993. Evidence and Inquiry: Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell.

Janssen-Lauret, Frederique, 2016. ‘Committing to an Individual: Ontological Commitment, Reference and Epistemology.’ Synthese 193: 583–604.

Johnson, W. E., 1921. Logic, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jones, E. E. C., 1890. Elements of Logic as a Science of Propositions. Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark.

———, 1892. An Introduction to General Logic. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.

———, 1905. A Primer of Logic. New York: E. P. Dutton.

MacBride, Fraser and Frederique Janssen-Lauret, 2015. ‘Meta-Ontology, Epistemology and Essence: On the Empirical Deduction of the Categories.’ The Monist 98: 290–302.

Milkov, Nikolay, 2003. ‘Susan Stebbing’s Criticism of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.’ Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 10: 351–63.

Moore, G. E., 1899. ‘The Nature of Judgment.’ Mind 8: 176–93.

———, 1903. ‘The Refutation of Idealism.’ Mind 12: 433–53.

———, 1917–18. ‘The Conception of Reality.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 18: 101–20.

Quine, W. V., 1936. ‘Definition of Substitution.’ Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 42: 561–69.

———, 1951. ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism.’ The Philosophical Review 60: 20–43.

Russell, Bertrand, 1905. ‘On Denoting.’ Mind 14: 479–93.

———, 1919. ‘On Propositions.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society suppl. vol. 2: 1–43.

———, 1986. The Philosophy of Logical Atomism and Other Essays: 1914–19. Chicago: Open Court, 1986.

Stebbing, L. S., 1912a. ‘Pragmatism and the Dictum “All Truths Work”.’ Mind 21, 471–72.

———, 1912b. ‘The Notion of Truth in Bergson’s Theory of Knowledge.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society n.s. 13: 224–56.

———, 1913. ‘The “Working” of “Truths”.’ Mind 22: 250–53.

———, 1914. Pragmatism and French Voluntarism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———, 1916–17. ‘Relation and Coherence.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society n.s. 17: 459–80.

———, 1917–18. ‘The Philosophical Importance of the Verb “To Be”.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society n.s. 18: 582–89.

———, 1930. A Modern Introduction to Logic, 1st ed. London: Methuen.

———, 1932–33. ‘The Method of Analysis in Metaphysics.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 33: 65–94.

———, 1933a. A Modern Introduction to Logic, 2nd ed. London: Methuen.

———, 1933b. Logical Positivism and Analysis. London: H. Milford.

———, 1933c. ‘Mr. Joseph’s Defence of Free Thinking in Logistics.’ Mind 42: 338–51.

———, 1934. ‘Directional Analysis and Basic Facts.’ Analysis 2: 33–36.

———, 1937. Philosophy and the Physicists. London: Methuen.

———, 1939. Thinking to Some Purpose. London: Penguin.

———, 1941. Ideals and Illusions. London: Watts and Co.

Wisdom, John, 1944. ‘L. S. Stebbing, 1885–1943.’ Mind 53: 283–85.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v5i2.2928


Frederique Janssen-Lauret
University of Nottingham
United Kingdom

--