The Substance Argument of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus

Michael Morris


In Morris (2008) I presented in outline a new interpretation of the famous ‘substance argument’ in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus (Wittgenstein 1922). The account I presented there gave a distinctive view of Wittgenstein’s main concerns in the argument, but did not explain in detail how the argument works: how its steps are to be found in the text, and how it concludes. I remain convinced that the interpretation I proposed correctly identifies the main concerns which lie behind the argument. I return to the argument here in order to elaborate in fuller detail the relation between those concerns and the actual course of the text.

Full Text:



Conant, James, 2000. ‘Elucidation and Nonsense in Frege and Early Wittgenstein.’ In The New Wittgenstein, edited by A. Crary and R. Read, pp. 174–217. London: Routledge.

Diamond, Cora, 1991. ‘Throwing Away the Ladder: How to Read the Tractatus.’ In The Realistic Spirit, pp. 179–204. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kant, Immanuel, 1997. Critique of Pure Reason, translated by P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Monk, Ray, 1996. Bertrand Russell: The Spirit of Solitude. London: Jonathan Cape.

Morris, Michael, 2008. The Routledge Philosophy GuideBook to Wittgenstein and the Tractatus. London and New York: Routledge.

Potter, Michael, 2009. Review of M. Morris, The Routledge GuideBook to Wittgenstein and the Tractatus. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews., accessed 1 July 2016.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, translated by C. K. Ogden. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

———, 1973. Letters to C. K. Ogden with Comments on the English Translation of the Tractatus, edited by G. H. von Wright. Oxford: Blackwell.

———, 1979. Notebooks 1914–1916, 2nd ed., edited by G. H. von Wright and G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.


Michael Morris
University of Sussex

Professor of Philosophy