Pushing Wittgenstein and Quine Closer Together
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v2i10.2424Abstract
As against the view represented here by Peter Hacker and John Canfield, I urge that the philosophies of Quine and Wittgenstein can be reconciled. Both replace the orthodox view of language as resting on reference: Quine with the notion of linguistic disposition, Wittgenstein with the notions of grammar and forms of life. I argue that Wittgenstein's insistence, in the rule-following discussion, that at bottom these are matters of practice, of ‘what we do’, is not only compatible in a rough sort of way with Quine's outlook, but is very close to Quine's naturalistic view of language. And I argue that the likely objections to this can on the one hand be explained away as Quine's having been interested in a very narrow slice of language in comparison with Wittgenstein, and on the other by a failure to take into account later developments in Quine’s views.
References
Blackburn, S. (1984) Spreading the Word: Groundings in the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Canfield, J. (1996) ‘Wittgenstein versus Quine’, in R. Arrington and H. Glock (eds), Wittgenstein and Quine, London: Routledge.
Diamond, C. (1991) The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: Bradford Books.
Dreben, B. (1996) ‘Quine and Wittgenstein: The Odd Couple’, in R. Arrington and H Glock. (eds), Wittgenstein and Quine, London: Routledge, pp. 39-61.
Fogelin, R. (2009) Taking Wittgenstein at His Word: A Textual Study. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gibson, R. (1996) ‘Wittgenstein, Quine and Holism’, in R. Arrington and H. Glock (eds), Wittgenstein and Quine, London: Routledge. pp. 80-96.
Glock, H. (2003) Quine and Davidson on Language, Thought and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hacker, P. (1996a) ‘Wittgenstein and Quine: Proximity at a Great Distance’, in R. Arrington and H Glock. (eds), Wittgenstein and Quine, London: Routledge.
Hacker, P. (1996b) Wittgenstein’s Place in Twentieth Century Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hookway, C. (1996) ‘Perspicuous Representations’, in R. Arrington and H Glock. (eds), Wittgenstein and Quine, London: Routledge, pp. 62-79.
Hylton, P. (2007) Quine. London: Routledge.
Jónsson, Ó, (2000) ‘Quine and Kripke’s Wittgenstein’, in The Linguistics Philosophy Interface: MIT Working Papers in Philosophy and Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT Press, pp. 261-74.
Kemp, G. (2010) ‘Quine: The Challenge of Naturalism’, in The European Journal of Philosophy 18/2, pp. 283-95.
Kemp, G. (2012) Quine versus Davidson: Truth, Reference.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kripke, S. (1982) Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Long, R. (2010) ‘Wittgenstein on rule-following’, in K. Jolley (ed.), Wittgenstein: Key Concepts. Durham: Acumen.
Loomis, E. (2010) ‘Criteria’, in K. Jolley (ed.) Wittgenstein: Key Concepts. Durham: Acumen.
Marconi, D. (2012) ‘Quine and Wittgenstein on the Science/Philosophy Divide’. Humanamente 21 pp. 173-89.
McDowell, J. (1984) ‘Wittgenstein on Following a Rule’, Synthese 58 pp. 325-63.
McGinn, M. (1997) Wittgenstein and the Philosophical Investigations. London: Routledge.
Peacocke, C. (1981). ‘Rule-Following: The Nature of Wittgenstein’s Arguments’, in Holtzman, Steven H., Wittgenstein: to follow a rule. Oxford: Routledge, pp. 72-95.
Quine, W. V. (1961 [1953]) From a Logical Point of View, second edition (noted in the text as FLPV). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. (1960) Word and Object (noted in the text as WO). Cambridge, Mass.: M. I. T. Press.
Quine, W. V. (1969) Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (noted in the text as OR). New York: Columbia University Press.
Quine, W. V. (1974) The Roots of Reference (noted in the text as RR). La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.
Quine, W. V. (1976) Ways of Paradox, revised edition (noted in the text as WP). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W.V. (1981) Theories and Things (noted in the text as TT). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. (1982) Methods of Logic, fourth edition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. (1986) Philosophy of Logic, second edition (noted in the text as PL). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. (1992) Pursuit of Truth, second edition (noted in the text as PT). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. (1995a) From Stimulus to Science (noted in the text as SS). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. (1995b) Selected Logic Papers (noted in the text as SLP). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. (2000) 'Reply to George', in Orenstein, A. and Kotatko, P., Knowledge, language, and logic: questions for Quine. Boston, Mass. and London: Kluwer.
Quine, W. V. (2008a) Confessions of a Confirmed Extensionalist and Other Essays (noted in the text as CCE), ed. by D. Føllesdal and D. Quine. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. (2008b Quine in Dialogue, (noted in the text as QD), ed. by D. Føllesdal and D. Quine. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations, (noted in the text as PI) ed. by E. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright; tr. by E. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958) The Blue and Brown Books (noted in the text as BB), ed. and tr. by R. Rhees. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1967) Zettel (noted in the text as Z), ed. by E. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright; tr. by E. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1969) On Certainty (noted in the text as OC), ed. by E. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright; tr. by D. Paul and E. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1980) Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology (noted in the text as RPP), Volume I, ed. by G. Anscombe and G. von Wright; tr. by G. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.