Bipolarity and Sense in the Tractatus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v2i9.2298Abstract
Although the terms ‘poles’, ‘bipolar’, and ‘bipolarity’ do not appear in the Tractatus, it is widely held that Wittgenstein maintained his commitment to bipolarity in the Tractatus. As it is usually understood, the principle of bipolarity is that every proposition must be capable of being true and capable of being false, which rules out propositions that are necessarily true or necessarily false. Here I argue that Wittgenstein was committed to bipolarity in the Tractatus, but getting a clear view of this commitment requires a different understanding of bipolarity. Properly understood, bipolarity is the view that every proposition represents two possible states of affairs, one positive and the other negative. Of course, in the case of elementary propositions, the sense of a proposition is only the positive state of affairs. There is thus an asymmetry between what a proposition represents, its true-false poles, and what it says, its sense. In this paper I show how Wittgenstein accounted for this asymmetry in Notes on Logic and I consider two ways he might have accounted for it in the Tractatus.
References
Max Black. A Companion to Wittgenstein’s ‘Tractatus’. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1964.
Irving Block, editor. Perspectives on the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. MIT press, Cambridge, MA, 1981.
Peter Carruthers. Tractarian Semantics: Finding Sense in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Blackwell, Oxford, 1989.
William Child. Wittgenstein. Routledge, London, 2011. E. Friedlander. Expressions of Judgment. Ph.D. Dissertation. Harvard University, 1992.
Hans-Johann, Glock. Necessity and Normativity. In Sluga and Stern 1996, 198–225, 1996.
P.M.S. Hacker. The Rise and Fall of the Picture Theory. In Block 1981, 85–109, 1981.
Michael Kremer. Contextualism and Holism in the Early Wittgenstein: From Prototractatus to Tractatus. Philosophical Topics 25, 87–120, 1997.
Michael Morris. Wittgenstein and the Tractatus. Routledge, London, 2008.
Matthew Ostrow. Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.
Proops, Ian. Logic and Language in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Routledge, London, 2000.
Thomas Ricketts. Pictures, Logic, and the Limits of Sense in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. In Sluga and Stern 1996, 59–99, 1996.
Hans Sluga and David Stern, editors. The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
Ludwig Wittgenstein. Notes on Logic. In Wittgenstein 1979, 93–107, 1913.
Ludwig Wittgenstein. Notes Dictated to G.E. Moore in Norway. In Wittgenstein 1979, 108–119, 1914.
Ludwig Wittgenstein. Philosophical Investigations, Third Edition. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. Macmillan Company, New York, 1958.
Ludwig Wittgenstein. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness. Routledge, London, 1961.
Ludwig Wittgenstein. Prototractatus. Eds. B.F. McGuinness, T. Nyberg, and G.H. von Wright. Translated by D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1971.
Ludwig Wittgenstein. Notebooks 1914-1916, Second Edition. Edited by G.H. von Wright and G.E.M. Anscombe. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
1979.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
