When There Was Nothing to Discuss
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v15i5.6673Abstract
We offer a novel interpretation of Frank Ramsey’s talk, “On There Being No Discussable Subject,” delivered to the Cambridge Apostles Society in 1925. We suggest that Ramsey aimed to present a reductio ad absurdum argument. His argument was that if the prevailing philosophical outlook among the Apostles were true, then we would conclude that there is nothing to discuss in the Society. Ramsey believed that this conclusion is absurd. His point was to challenge the Apostles by telling them that their theoretical philosophical commitments fail to explain why, indeed, there is much to discuss in the Society in practice. Exploring Ramsey’s reductio argument motivates a new historical explanation for the pragmatist philosophy he developed in the second half of the 1920s. It also facilitates a new reading of his pragmatism and its significance. More specifically, we argue that Ramsey developed his pragmatism partly due to his concern that the prevailing philosophical outlook within Cambridge-based intellectual circles, such as the Apostles Society, seemed to fail to account for the epistemic value of their members’ non-expert conversations with each other. His pragmatism left us hints about how to make sense of the epistemology of disagreements in our daily social lives.
Downloads
References
Allen, Peter. 1978. The Cambridge Apostles: The Early Years. Cambridge University Press.
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1980. “Reviewed Work(s): Foundations: Essays in Philosophy, Logic, Mathematics and Economics by F.P. Ramsey and D.H. Mellor.” Journal of Political Economy 88 (3): 636–38.
ASP.1983.01, Box 7, Folder 6. Archives & Special Collections, University of Pittsburgh Library System, Archives of Scientific Philosophy, Frank Plumpton Ramsey Papers, 1920–1930.
Bateman, Bradley W. 1987. “Keynes’s Changing Conception of Probability.” Economics & Philosophy 3 (1): 97–119.
Bell, Clive. 1914. Art. New York: Frederick A. Stokes Company.
Carter, Adam, and Duncan Pritchard. 2015. “Intellectual Humility, Knowledge-How, and Disagreement.” In Moral and Intellectual Virtues in Western and Chinese Philosophy: The Turn Toward Virtue, edited by C. Mi, M. Slote, and E. Sosa, 49–63. Routledge.
Deacon, Richard. 1986. The Cambridge Apostles: A History of Cambridge University’s Elite Intellectual Secret Society. New York: Farrer, Straus & Giroux.
Diamond, Cora. 2011. “‘We Can’t Whistle It Either’: Legend and Reality.” European Journal of Philosophy 19 (3): 335–56.
Engelmann, Paul. 1967. Letters from Ludwig Wittgenstein: With a Memoir. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Gaspard, Marion. 2003. “Ramsey’s Theory of National Saving: A Mathematician in Cambridge.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25 (4): 413–35.
GBR/0265/UA/Min.IX.42/89. Minutes of Meetings of the Moral Sciences Club. Cambridge University Library, University Archives.
GBR/0265/UA/SOC.101. Records of the Cambridge University Labour Club. Cambridge University Library, University Archives.
GBR/0265/UA/SOC.47. Minutes of Meetings of the Cambridge University Socialist Society and its Precursor, Cambridge University Fabian Society, Signed, 1911-1958. Cambridge University Library, University Archives.
GBR/0272/KCAS/39. Apostles Collection. King’s College Cambridge Archives.
Holroyd, Michael. 1968. Lytton Strachey: A Critical Biography (Volume 2: The Years of Achievement, 1910-1932). New York: Holt.
Holton, Richard, and Huw Price. 2003. “Ramsey on Saying and Whistling: A Discordant Note.” Noûs 37 (2): 325–41.
Hussey, Mark. 2021. Clive Bell and the Making of Modernism: A Biography. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Keynes, John Maynard. (1905) 1912. “A Theory of Beauty.” Archive Centre, King’s College, Cambridge, John Maynard Keynes Collection. GBR/0272/JMK/UA/23/2/4.
———. 1921. “Presidential Address to the Society of Apostles, 1921-06.” Archive Centre, King’s College, Cambridge, John Maynard Keynes Collection. GBR/0272/JMK/UA/36/8.
———. 1923. “The Underlying Principles.” In The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes (Volume 17: Activities 1920-1922), edited by E. Johnson, 448–54. Cambridge University Press.
———. 1938. “My Early Beliefs.” In The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes (Volume 10: Essays in Biography), edited by A. Robinson and D. Moggridge, 433–50. Cambridge University Press.
———. (1921) 2013. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes (Volume 8: A Treatise on Probability). Edited by A. Robinson and D. Moggridge. Cambridge University Press.
Klein, Alexander. 2017. “In Defense of Wishful Thinking: James, Quine, Emotions, and the Web of Belief.” In Pragmatism and the European Traditions: Encounters with Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology Before the Great Divide, edited by Maria Baghramian and Sarin Marchetti, 228–50. Routledge.
Levy, Paul. 1980. Moore: G. E. Moore and the Cambridge Apostles. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Lubenow, William C. 1998. The Cambridge Apostles, 1820-1914: Liberalism, Imagination, and Friendship in British Intellectual and Professional Life. Cambridge University Press.
Majer, Ulrich. 1989. “Ramsey’s Conception of Theories: An Intuitionistic Approach.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 6 (2): 233–58.
Marouzi, Soroush. 2022. “Frank Plumpton Ramsey and the Politics of Motherhood.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 44 (4): 489–508.
———. 2024. “Frank Ramsey’s Anti-Intellectualism.” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 12 (2).
———. 2026. “In Search of Lost Reason: Ramsey, Keynes, and the Intellectualism Debate.” History of Social Science 2 (1): 45–86.
———. Forthcoming. “Frank Ramsey’s Politics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Frank Ramsey, edited by P. G. Duarte and C. Misak. Cambridge University Press.
McGuinness, Brian. 2008. Wittgenstein in Cambridge: Letters and Documents, 1911-1951. Oxford: Blackwell.
Methven, S. J. 2014. “Whistling in 1929: Ramsey and Wittgenstein on the Infinite.” European Journal of Philosophy 24 (3): 651–69.
Misak, Cheryl. 2016a. Cambridge Pragmatism: From Peirce and James to Ramsey and Wittgenstein. Oxford University Press.
———. 2016b. “Ramsey’s Cognitivism: Truth, Ethics and the Meaning of Life.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 78: 251–63.
———. 2020. Frank Ramsey: A Sheer Excess of Powers. Oxford University Press.
———. 2023. “Hypotheses as Expectations: Ramsey and Wittgenstein 1929.” In Wittgenstein’s Philosophy in 1929, edited by F. F. Figueiredo, 115–30. Routledge.
Monk, Ray. 1990. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius. The Free Press.
Moore, G. E. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge University Press.
Pianalto, Matthew. 2011. “Speaking for Oneself: Wittgenstein on Ethics.” Inquiry 54 (3): 252–76.
Ramsey, Frank P. 1923a. “Critical Notices.” Mind 32 (128): 465–78.
———. 1923b. “Induction: Keynes and Wittgenstein.” In Notes on Philosophy, Probability, and Mathematics, 296–301.
———. 1923c. “Socialism and Equality of Income.” In Notes on Philosophy, Probability, and Mathematics, 313–19.
———. 1924. “Sex from the Point of View of Society.” In Notes on Philosophy, Probability, and Mathematics, 325–29.
———. 1925a. “Civilization and Happiness.” In Notes on Philosophy, Probability, and Mathematics, 320–24.
———. 1925b. “Epilogue.” In Philosophical Papers, 245–50.
———. 1925c. Letter from Frank Plumpton Ramsey to J. M. Keynes. 11 December 1925. Archive Centre, King’s College, Cambridge, John Maynard Keynes Collection. GBR/0272/JMK/PP/45/262.
———. 1925d. “On There Being No Discussable Subject.” In Notes on Philosophy, Probability, and Mathematics, 330–35.
———. 1926. “Truth and Probability.” In Philosophical Papers, 52–94.
———. 1929a. “General Propositions and Causality.” In Philosophical Papers, 145–63.
———. 1929b. “Philosophy.” In Philosophical Papers, 1–7.
———. 1931. The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays. Edited by R. B. Braithwaite. London: Kegan Paul.
———. 1990. Philosophical Papers. Edited by D. H. Mellor. Cambridge University Press.
———. 1991a. Notes on Philosophy, Probability, and Mathematics. Edited by Maria Carla Galavotti. Bibliopolis.
———. 1991b. On Truth. Edited by Nicholas Rescher and Ulrich Majer. Berlin: Springer Science.
Ranalli, Chris, and Thirza Lagewaard. 2022. “Deep Disagreement (Part 1): Theories of Deep Disagreement.” Philosophy Compass 17 (12): 1–18.
Rosenbaum, S. P. 1998. Aspects of Bloomsbury: Studies in Modern English Literary and Intellectual History. Macmillan Press Ltd.
Sidgwick, Arthur, and Eleanor Mildred Sidgwick. 1906. Henry Sidgwick: A Memoir. Macmillan and Co.
Sousa, Ronald. 2022. “Don’t Ask If Love Is Moral.” In The Moral Psychology of Love, edited by Arina Pismenny and Berit Berit Brogaard, 13–34. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Sullivan, Peter, and Colin Johnston. 2018. “Judgments, Facts, and Propositions: Theories of Truth in Russell, Wittgenstein and Ramsey.” In The Oxford Handbook of Truth, edited by Michael Glanzberg, 150–92. Oxford University Press.
Vickers, John M. 2004. “Ramsey on Judgment: The Theory of ‘Facts and Propositions’.” Dialectica 58 (4): 499–516.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
———. 1974. Letters to Russell, Keynes, and Moore. Edited by G. H. Wright. Cornell University Press.
Woolf, Leonard. 1914. The Wise Virgins. New York and London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
