Evidence and Cause in Nineteenth-Century Naturalized Kantianism:
Helmholtz, Lange, and Quine’s Argumentative Strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v14i4.5920Abstract
This paper argues that W. V. O. Quine’s twentieth-century evidential and proximal theory of meaning and belief, developed in opposition to Donald Davidson, employs argumentation strategies strikingly similar to those of Hermann von Helmholtz and Friedrich Albert Lange in their nineteenth-century efforts to naturalize Kant’s epistemology. Contrary to Jim Hopkins’s interpretation, which links Helmholtz’s theory of unconscious predictive inferences with Davidson’s causal theory of action and truth-conditional semantics (2018), this paper contends that Quine’s epistemic externalism, rooted in a naturalized account of evidentiality and proximality, aligns more closely with Helmholtz and Lange’s psychophysiological theory of meaning.
Downloads
References
Bouveresse, Jacques. 2004. Langage, Perception et Réalité. Tome 2, Physique, Phénoménologie et Grammaire. Nîmes: J. Chambon.
Chignell, Andrew. 2008. “Neo-Kantian Philosophies of Science: Cassirer, Kuhn, and Friedman.” The Philosophical Forum 39: 239–52.
Davidson, Donald. 1963. “Actions, Reasons and Causes.” The Journal of Philosophy 60 (23): 685–700.
———. 1967. “Truth and Meaning.” Synthese 17 (3): 304–23.
———. 1974. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47: 5–20.
———. 1990. “Meaning, Truth and Evidence.” In Perspectives on Quine, edited by Robert B. Barrett and Roger F. Gibson, 68–79. Cambridge: Blackwell.
———. 1994. “On Quine’s Philosophy.” Theoria 60 (3): 184–92.
———. (1991) 2001. “Epistemology Externalized.” In Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, 93–104. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 2001. Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Edgar, Scott. 2013. The Limits of Experience and Explanation: F. A. Lange and Ernst Mach on Things in Themselves 21 (1): 100–21.
———. 2015. “The Physiology of the Sense Organs and Early Neo-Kantian Conceptions of Objectivity: Helmholtz, Lange, Liebmann".” In Objectivity in Science, edited by F. Padovani, A. Richardson, and J. Y. Tsou, 101–22. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Fechner, Gustav Theodor. 1877. In Sachen der Psychophysick. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.
Friedman, Michael. 2012. “Scientific Philosophy from Helmholtz to Carnap and Quine.” Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 16: 1–11.
Fullinwider, S. P. 1990. “Hermann von Helmholtz: The Problem of Kantian Influence.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 21 (1): 41–55.
Fullinwinder, S. P. 1991. “Darwin Faces Kant: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Physiology.” The British Journal for the History of Science 24 (1): 21–44.
Gubelmann, Reto. 2019. A Science-Based Critique of Epistemological Naturalism in Quine’s Tradition. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Hacker, P. M. S. 1995. “Helmholtz’s Theory of Perception: An Investigation into Its Conceptual Framework.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (3): 199–214.
Hatfield, Gary. 1990. The Natural and the Normative: Theories of Spatial Perception from Kant to Helmholtz. Cambridge: MIT Press.
———. 2018. “Helmholtz and Philosophy: Science, Perception, and Metaphysics, with Variations on Some Fichtean Themes.” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 6 (3): 12–41.
Heidelberger, Michael. 2015. “Naturalisierung Des Transzendentalen in Der Sinnesphysiologie von Hermann von Helmholtz.” Scientia Poetica 19 (1): 205–33.
Helmholtz, Hermann von. 1893. Einleitung Zu Den Vorlesungen Über Theoretische Physik. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth.
———. (1855) 1896. “Ueber Das Sehen Des Menschen.” In Vorträge Und Reden, 85–118. Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn.
———. (1867) 1925. Helmholtz’s Treatise on Physiological Optics. Translated by James P. C. Southall. Rochester: The Optical Society of America.
———. (1878) 1977. “The Fact in Perception.” In Epistemological Writings: The Paul Hertz/Moritz Schlick Centenary Edition of 1921 with Notes and Commentary by the Editors, translated by Malcolm F. Lowe. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Pub. Co.
———. (1868) 1995. “The Recent Progress of the Theory of Vision.” In Science and Culture: Popular and Philosophical Essays, 127–203. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———. 1995. Science and Culture: Popular and Philosophical Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hohwy, Jakob. 2013. The Predictive Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hopkins, Jim. 2018. “Kantian Neuroscience and Radical Interpretation: Ways of Meaning in the Bayesian Brain.” In Mind, Language, and Morality: Essays in Honor of Mark Platts, edited by G. Ortiz-Millán and J.A.Cruz Parcero, 115–47. New York: Routledge.
Hyder, David. 2013. “Time, Norms, and Structure in Nineteenth-Century Philosophy of Science.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy, edited by M. Beaney. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hylton, Peter. 2007. Quine. New York: Routledge.
Isaac, Alistair. 2020. “Realism Without Tears II: The Structuralist Legacy of Sensory Physiology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 79 (C): 15–29.
Kant, Immanuel. 2018. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kemp, Gary. 2013. Quine Versus Davidson: Truth, Reference, and Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2024. “Quine, Evidence, and Our Science.” Philosophical Studies 181: 961–76.
de Kock, Liesbet. 2011. “Some Preliminary Considerations on Helmholtz’s Fichte: Towards a Naturalized Epistemology of Constraint?” Revista de Estud(i)os Sobre Fichte 2. DOI: 10.4000/ref.350.
———. 2014a. “Critical and Metacritical Dimensions in Helmholtz’s Account of Human Vision.” Casys: International Journal of Computing Anticipatory Systems 26: 35--48.
———. 2014b. “Hermann von Helmholtz’s Empirico-Transcendentalism Reconsidered: Construction and Constitution in Helmholtz’s Psychology of the Object.” Science in Context 4: 709--744.
———. 2014c. “In the Beginning Was the Act: A Historical and Systematic Analysis of Hermann von Helmholtz’s Psychology of the Object.” Dissertation, Ghent University.
———. 2016. “Helmholtz’s Kant Revisited (Once More). The All-Pervasive Nature of Helmholtz’s Struggle with Kant’s Anschauung.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56: 20–32.
Lange, Friedrich Albert. (1875) 1880a. History of Materialism and Criticism of Its Present Importance. Translated by E. C. Thomas. II. Boston: Houghton, Osgood & Company.
———. (1875) 1880b. History of Materialism and Criticism of Its Present Importance. Translated by E. C. Thomas. III. Boston: Houghton, Osgood & Company.
Lepore, Ernst, and Kirk Ludwig. 2005. Donald Davidson: Meaning, Truth, Language, and Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, Harry A., and David Holdcroft. 1997. “Quine on the Threshold of Evidence.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 51: 521–39.
Meyering, Theo C. 1989. Historical Roots of Cognitive Science: The Rise of a Cognitive Theory of Perception from Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Patton, Lydia. 2009. “Signs, Toy Models, and the a Priori: From Helmholtz to Wittgenstein.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40 (3): 281–89.
———. 2018. “Helmholtz’s Physiological Psychology.” In Philosophy of Mind in the Nineteenth Century, edited by S. Lapointe, 96–116. New York: Routledge.
Pecere, Paolo. 2021. “‘Physiological Kantianism’ and the ‘Organisation of the Mind’: A Reconsideration.” Intellectual History Review 31 (4): 643–714.
Pizlo, Zygmunt. 2001. “Perception Viewed as an Inverse Problem.” Vision Research 41: 3145–61.
Quine, Willard V. O. 1951. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” Philosophical Review 60: 20–43.
———. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. The John Dewey Essays in Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
———. 1975a. “Replies.” In Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, edited by Donald Davidson and Jaakko Hintikka, 292–352. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
———. 1975b. “The Nature of Natural Knowledge.” In Mind and Language, edited by S. Guttenplan, 67–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 1981. Theories and Things. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
———. (1974) 1990. The Roots of Reference. The Paul Carus Lectures, no. 14. La Salle: Open Court.
———. 1990a. “Comment on Davidson.” In Perspectives on Quine, edited by Robert B. Barrett and Roger F. Gibson. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
———. 1990b. “Where Do We Disagree?” In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, edited by L. E. Hahn, 73–79. Ill: Open Court Publishing Company.
———. (1990) 1992. Pursuit of Truth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
———. 1995. From Stimulus to Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
———. 2008. Confessions of a Confirmed Extensionalist and Other Essays. Edited by D. Føllesdal and D. B. Quine. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
———. 2013. Word and Object. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Schiemann, Gregor. 2009. Hermann von Helmholtz’s Mechanism: The Loss of Certainty. Dordrecht: Springer.
Sinclair, Robert. 2007. “Quine’s Naturalized Epistemology and the Third Dogma of Empiricism.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (3): 455–72.
Swanson, Link R. 2016. “The Predictive Processing Paradigm Has Roots in Kant.” Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 10 (79): 1–13.
Tracz, R. Brian. 2018. “Helmholtz on Perceptual Properties.” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 6 (3): 64–78.
Verhaegh, Sander. 2014. “Quine’s Argument from Despair.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (1): 150–73.
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
