Understanding Naturalism With Quine From Within Science and History
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v14i3.5908Abstract
In this essay, I present Quine’s fragmented and often forgotten views on writing history. However, this needs to be done in conjunction with an examination of his notion of science as our “total world-picture.” Quine elegantly avoids the task of specifying a demarcation criterion of science. The result is to position science as a Wittgensteinian language game that gradually expanded from its purpose of predicting our experiences and became socio-historically institutionalized set of practices. Thus, this essay has two aims; (i) I analyze Quine’s idiosyncratic, post-positivist concept of science with a particular focus on his inclusion of sciences that are traditionally labeled as soft or social. Then, (ii) I eventually indicate how Quine deals with historical inquiry. When taken together, this essay can also be read as a case study analysis of Quine’s take on all non-experimental modes of scientific inquiry, and, more broadly, his special account of naturalism and pragmatism.
Downloads
References
Ankersmit, Franklin Rudolf. 2013. “Reply to Professor Roth: On How Antidogmatism Bred Dogmatism.” Rethinking History 17 (4): 570–85.
Arenberg, I. Kaufman, Vincent J.M. Di Maio, and Michael M. Baden. 2020. “A Reevaluation of the Death of Vincent van Gogh: Suicide or Murder? The Need for a Definitive Autopsy.” The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology 41 (4).
Borradori, Giovanna. 1994. The American Philosopher: Conversations with Quine, Davidson, Putnam, Nozick, Danto, Rorty, Cavell, MacIntyre, Kuhn. Translated by R. Crocitto. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bryant, Amanda. 2020. “NATURALISMS.” Think 19 (56): 35–50.
Ciupe, Antonela. 2007. “Quine and Postmodernism.” Lingua B. Cultură Şi Civilizaţie, no. VI–VII: 25–32.
Currie, Adrian. 2018. Rock, Bone, and Ruin: An Optimist’s Guide to the Historical Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Currie, Adrian, and Derek Turner. 2016. “Introduction: Scientific Knowledge of the Deep Past.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A 55: 43–46.
Dasgupta, Soumit, Robby Vanspauwen, Enis Alpin Guneri, and Marco Mandala. 2022. “Vincent van Gogh and the Elusive Diagnosis of Vestibular Migraine.” Medical Hypotheses 159.
De Regt, Henk W. 2017. Understanding Scientific Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dreben, Burton. 1992. “Putnam, Quine—and the Facts.” Philosophical Topics 20 (1): 293–315.
Fracchia, Joseph, and R. C. Lewontin. 1999. “Does Culture Evolve?” History and Theory 38 (4): 52–78.
Gibson, Roger F. 1992. “The Key to Interpreting Quine.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (4): 17–30.
Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2014. “Quine and Pragmatism.” In A Companion to W. V. O. Quine, edited by G. Harman and E. Lepore, 54–68. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Gould, Stephen Jay. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gould, Stephen Jay, and Elisabeth S. Vrba. 1982. “Exaptation – a Missing Term in the Science of Form.” Paleobiology 8 (1): 4–15.
Haack, Susan. 1993. “The Two Faces of Quine’s Naturalism.” Synthese 94: 335–56.
Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Heyes, Cecilia. 2018. Cognitive Gadgets: The Cultural Evolution of Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hookway, Christopher. 1988. Language, Experience and Reality. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hubálek, Michal. 2021. “A Brief (Hi)story of Just-so Stories in Evolutionary Science.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 51 (5): 447–68.
Hylton, Peter. 2007. Quine. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kemp, Gary. 2017. “Quine, Publicity, and Pre-Established Harmony.” ProtoSociology 34: 59–72.
Kuukkanen, Jouni-Matti. 2015. Postnarrativist Philosophy of Historiography. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Patterson, Dennis M. 1996. Law and Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peregrin, Jaroslav. 2016. Meaning and Structure: Structuralism of (Post)analytic Philosophers. New York: Routledge.
Portmann, Adolf. 1990. A Zoologist Looks at Humankind. Translated by J. Schaefer. New York: Columbia University Press.
Putnam, Hilary. 1992. “The Greatest Logical Positivist.” In Realism with a Human Face, edited by James Conant, 268–77. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1957. “The Scope and Language of Science.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8 (29): 1–17.
———. 1961a. “Identity, Ostension, and Hypostasis.” In From a Logical Point of View: Logico-Philosophical Essays, 65–79. New York: Harper and Row.
———. 1961b. “On What There Is.” In From a Logical Point of View: Logico-Philosophical Essays, 1–19. New York: Harper and Row.
———. 1961c. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” In From a Logical Point of View: Logico-Philosophical Essays, 20–46. New York: Harper and Row.
———. 1969a. “Epistemology Naturalized.” In Ontological Relativity, 69–90. New York: Columbia University Press.
———. 1969b. “Natural Kinds.” In Ontological Relativity, 114–38. New York: Columbia University Press.
———. 1969c. “Speaking of Objects.” In Ontological Relativity, 1–25. New York: Columbia University Press.
———. 1975. “Replies.” In Words and Objections, edited by D. Davidson and J. Hintikka, 292–352. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
———. 1976. “Necessary Truth.” In The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, Revised and Enlarged Edition, 68–76. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1981. “Fives Milestones of Empiricism.” In Theories and Things, 67–72. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1987. Quiddities: An Intermittently Philosophical Dictionary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1992. Pursuit of Truth. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1993. “In Praise of Observation Sentences.” The Journal of Philosophy 90 (3): 107–16.
———. 1995a. From Stimulus to Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1995b. “Naturalism; or, Living Within One’s Means.” Dialectica 49 (2–4): 251–63.
———. 2000. “Quine’s Responses.” In Knowledge, Language and Logic: Questions for Quine, edited by A. Orenstein and P. Kotatko, 407–30. Berlin: Springer.
———. 2013. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Quine, Willard Van Orman, and J. S. Ullian. 1978. The Web of Belief. 2nd ed. New York: Random House.
Richerson, Peter J., and Morten H. Christiansen, eds. 2013. Cultural Evolution: Society, Technology, Language, and Religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rorty, Richard. 2021. Pragmatism as Anti-Authoritarianism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rosenberg, Alexander. 2018. How History Gets Things Wrong: The Neuroscience of Our Addiction to Stories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Roth, Paul A. 1983. “Reconstructing Quine: The Troubles with a Tradition.” Metaphilosophy 14 (3/4): 249–66.
———. 1999. “The Epistemology of ‘Epistemology Naturalized’.” Dialectica 53 (2): 87–110.
———. 2003. “Why There Is Nothing Rather Than Something: Quine on Behaviorism, Meaning, and Indeterminacy.” In Philosophy, Psychology, and Psychologism: Critical and Historical Readings on the Psychological Turn in Philosophy, edited by D. Jacquette, 263–87. Dordrecht: Springer.
———. 2008. “The Epistemology of Science After Quine.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, edited by P. Statis and M. Curd, 3–14. Abingdon: Routledge.
———. 2020. The Philosophical Structure of Historical Explanation. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Sellars, Wilfrid. 2007. “Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man.” In In the Space of Reasons: Selected Essays of Wilfrid Sellars, edited by R. Brandom and K. Scharp, 369–408. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stovall, Preston. 2015. “Inference by Analogy and the Progress of Knowledge: From Reflection to Determination in Judgements of Natural Purpose.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (4): 681–709.
Turnbull, Alan. 2022. Who Shot Van Gogh?: Facts and Counterfacts About the World’s Most Famous Artist. London: Thames & Hudson.
Verhaegh, Sander. 2018. Working from Within: The Nature and Development of Quine’s Naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Voskuil, Piet. 2020. “Vincent van Gogh and His Illness: A Reflection on a Posthumous Diagnostic Exercise.” Epilepsy & Behavior 111.
White, Hayden V. 1966. “The Burden of History.” History and Theory 5 (2): 111–34.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969. On Certainty. San Francisco: Harper Torchbooks.
Zammito, John H. 2004. A Nice Derangement of Epistemes: Post-Positivism in the Study of Science from Quine to Latour. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
