The Alternative Father of the Specious Present
The Experience of Time from E. Robert Kelly’s The Alternative: A Study in Psychology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v14i1.5820Abstract
The now common, if not uncontroversial, terminology of ‘the specious present’ was coined in Kelly’s The Alternative (Clay 1882). Through returning to Kelly’s work, I have three aims. First, to make the case for there being two distinct motivations behind an appeal to a temporally extended experience as of the present: a phenomenological sense in which an interval of time invariably seems temporally present; and a need to account for the experience of succession. Second, to bring into focus—explaining and dissolving—a puzzle of temporal experience encapsulated in Kelly’s appeal to ‘paradoxic’ and ‘anti-paradoxic’ experience. The third and subsidiary aim is to provide the first substantial outline of Kelly’s account of temporal experience. Despite the common usage of Kelly’s terminology in contemporary discussions of the experience of time, there is no dedicated discussion of Kelly, and of his view of our experience of time, in the literature. This is, no doubt, in large part due to the identity of Kelly being shrouded in mystery until very recently; it is also, plausibly, because of Kelly’s standing as an amateur philosopher. Nevertheless, the minor aim of the present paper is to remedy this neglect.
Downloads
References
Andersen, Holly. 2014. “The Development of the ‘Specious Present’ and James’ Views on Temporal Experience.” In Subjective Time: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Temporality, edited by Dan Lloyd and Arstila Valtteri, 25–42. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
———. 2017. “The Hodgsonian Account of Temporal Experience.” In The Routledge Handbook of Temporal Experience, edited by Ian Phillips, 69–81. London: Routledge.
———. 2023. “Hodgson on the Relations Between Philosophy, Science and Time.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 31: 161–82.
Andersen, Holly, and Rick Grush. 2009. “A Brief History of Time-Consciousness: Historical Precursors to James and Husserl.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 47: 277–307.
Arstila, Valtteri. 2018. “Temporal Experienes with the Specious Present.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96: 287–302.
Brown, Thomas. 1857. Philosophy of the Human Mind. 4 vols. Edinburgh: Adam & Charles Black.
Burns-Gibson, John. 1883. “Review: The Alternative: A Study in Psychology.” Mind 8: 109--16.
Chuard, Philippe. 2011. “Temporal Experiences and Their Parts.” Philosophers’ Imprint 11 (11).
Clay [Kelly], E. Robert [Edmund R.]. 1882. The Alternative: A Study in Psychology. London: Macmillan and Co.
Dainton, Barry. 2000. Stream of Consciousness. London: Routledge.
———. 2008. “Sensing Change.” Philosophical Issues 18: 362–84.
———. 2022. “Temporal Consciousness.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2022 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/consciousness-temporal/.
Grush, Rick. 2007. “Time and Experience.” In Philosophie Der Zeit: Neue Analytische Ansätze, edited by T. Müller, 27–44. Philosophie Der Zeit: Neue Analytische Ansätze. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
Hamilton, William. 1856. Discussions on Philosophy and Literature. New York: Harper.
Hodgson, Shadworth. 1878. Philosophy of Reflection. Vol. 1 & 2. London: Longsmans, Green.
———. 1898. The Metaphysic of Experience. 4 vols. London: Longsmans, Green.
Hoerl, Christoph. 2013. “A Succession of Feelings, in and of Itself, Is Not a Feeling of Succession.” Mind 122: 373–417.
Husserl, Edmund. 1991. On the Phenomenology of Consciousness of Internal Time. Translated by J. B. Brough. Dordrecth: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
James, William. 1983. The Principles of Pyschology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Le Poidevin, Robin. 2007. The Images of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lee, Geoffrey. 2014. “Temporal Experience and the Temporal Structure of Experience.” Philosophers’ Imprint 14 (3).
Lloyd, Dan, and Valtteri Arstila, eds. 2014. Subjective Time: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Temporality. Cambridge, MA: MIT PRess.
Lockwood, Michael. 1984. The Labyrinth of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Millar, Izchak. 1984. Husserl, Perception and Temporal Awareness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Moore, G. E. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Phillips, Ian. 2011. “Indiscriminability and Experience of Change.” Philosophical Quarterly 61: 808–27.
———. 2014. “The Temporal Structure of Experience.” In Subjective Time: The Philosophy, Pyschology, and Neuroscience of Temporality, edited by Dan Lloyd and Valtteri Arstila, 139–58. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Plumer, Gilbert. 1985. “The Myth of the Specious Present.” Mind 94: 19–35.
Prosser, Simon. 2016. Experiencing Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reid, Thomas. 2002. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Edited by Derek Brooks and Knud Haakonssen. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Sellars, Wilfrid. 1968. Science and Metaphysics: Variations on Kantian Themes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Shardlow, Jack. 2019. “Minima Sensibilia: Against the Dynamic Snapshot Model of Temporal Experience.” European Journal of Philosophy 27: 741–57.
———. 2020. “A Tale of Two Williams: James, Stern, and the Specious Present.” Philosophical Explorations 23: 79–94.
Soteriou, Matthew. 2013. The Mind’s Construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spicker, Stuart. 1973. “The Fundamental Constituents of Consciousness: Process-Contents and the Erlebnisstrom.” Man and World 6: 26–43.
Stern, William. 2005. “Mental Presence-Time.” In The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Research V, edited by C. Wolfe, translated by N. De Warren, 310–59. London: College Publications.
Thomas, Emily. 2023. “The Specious Present in English Philosophy 1749–1785: Theories an Experiments in Hartley, Priestley, Tucker, and Watson.” Philosophers’ Imprint 23 (7).
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
