Russell on Generality 1910 to 1918
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v13i4.5411Abstract
In Principia Mathematica, Russell thought that there are irreducibly general judgements with their own mode of truth. They are true in virtue of what the elementary judgements they collect together correspond to. In The Philosophy of Logical Atomism, Russell thought that they are true in virtue of general facts. In 1910, general facts are not even considered in order to reject them. In 1918, Russell announces that it cannot be doubted that there are general facts. This raises an intriguing question. What was it that led Russell to drop his 1910 view and drove him to the conclusion that there are general facts? I propose an answer that relies on a core aspect of Russell’s views on which he stayed firm throughout this period and on a preoccupation of his that began well before 1910: theories of truth and the problem of how false judgements are possible. I argue that Russell’s 1910 view failed to account adequately for the falsity of general judgements, while the correspondence theory of truth pushed him to accepting general facts. To round things off I also consider three independent arguments for general facts.
Downloads
References
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1971. An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. 4th ed. London: Hutchinson and Co.
Armstrong, David. 1997. A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge University Press.
———. 2004. Truth and Truth-Makers. Cambridge University Press.
Ayer, Alfred J. 1952. “Negation.” The Journal of Philosophy 49 (26): 797–815.
Demos, Raphael. 1917. “A Discussion of a Certain Type of Negative Propositions.” Mind 26: 188–96.
Denyer, Nicholas. 1991. Language, Thought and Falsehood in Ancient Greek Philosophy. London, New York: Routledge.
Eames, Elizabeth Ramsden. 1992. “Introduction.” In Bertrand Russell: Theory of Knowledge. The 1913 Manuscript. London, New York: Routledge.
Elkind, Landon D. C. 2021. “An Argument for Completely General Facts: Generalised Molecular Formulas in Logical Atomism.” Journal for the History of Analytic Philosophy 9 (7): 1–21.
Frege, Gottlob. 1884. Die Grundlagen Der Arithmetik. Eine Logisch-Mathematische Untersuchung Über Den Begriff Der Zahl. Breslau: H&M Marcus (Reprint: Hildesheim, Zürich, New York: Olms 1990).
———. 1893. Grundgesetze Der Arithmetik. Begriffsschriftlich Abgeleited. I. Band. Jena: Hermann Pohle.
Gaskin, Richard. 1997. “Fregean Sense and Russellian Propositions.” Philosophical Studies 86 (2): 131–54.
Geach, Peter T. 1972. “Assertion.” In Logic Matters, 254–69. Oxford: Blackwell.
Grossmann, Reinhardt. 1992. The Existence of the World. An Introduction to Ontology. London, New York: Routledge.
Hochberg, Herbert. 1969. “Negation and Generality.” Nous 3 (3): 325–43.
———. 1981. “Natural Necessity and Natural Laws.” Philosophy of Science 48 (3): 386–99.
Hossack, Keith. 2007. The Metaphysics of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2022. “A Summary of My Current Views.” In Knowledge, Number and Reality: Encounters with the Work of Keith Hossack, edited by Nils Kürbis, Bahram Assadian, and Jonathan Nassim. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Ito, Ryo. 2020. “Russell’s Theories of Judgement.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28 (1): 112–33.
Joachim, Harold. 1906. The Nature of Truth. Oxford: Clarendon.
Kaplan, David. 1975. “How to Russell a Frege-Church.” The Journal of Philosophy 72 (19): 716–29.
King, Jeffrey C. 2019. “Structured Propositions.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2019. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/propositions-structured/.
Kürbis, Nils. 2019a. “An Argument for Minimal Logic.” Dialectica 73 (1-2): 31–62.
———. 2019b. Proof and Falsity. A Logical Investigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2022. “Generality.” In Knowledge, Number and Reality: Encounters with the Work of Keith Hossack, edited by Nils Kürbis, Bahram Assadian, and Jonathan Nassim. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
———. 2024a. “Definite Descriptions.” In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, edited by H. Nesi and P. Milin, 3rd ed. Elsevier.
———. 2024b. “The Correspondence Theory of Truth.” In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, edited by H. Nesi and P. Milin, 3rd ed. Elsevier.
———. n.d. “A Russellian Theory of General Facts and Judgement.” In Preparation.
Kürbis, Nils, Bahram Assadian, and Jonathan Nassim. 2022. “Introduction.” In Knowledge, Number and Reality: Encounters with the Work of Keith Hossack, edited by Nils Kürbis, Bahram Assadian, and Jonathan Nassim. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Landini, Gregory. 1988. Russell’s Hidden Substitutional Theory. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2011. Russell. London, New York: Routledge.
Linsky, Bernard. 1988. “Propositional Functions and Universals in Principia Mathematica.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 66 (4): 447–60.
———. 1993. “Why Russell Abandoned Russelian Propositions.” In Russell and Analytic Philosophy, edited by A. D. Irvine and G. A. Wedeking. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
———. 1999. Russell’s Metaphysical Logic. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Miller, Alexander. 2006. “Russell, Multiple Relations, and the Correspondence Theory of Truth.” The Monist 89 (1): 85–101.
Muirhead, J. H., ed. 1924. Contemporary British Philosophy. Personal Statements. Vol. 1. London: Allen and Unwin.
Plato. 1997. “Theaetetus, Translated by M.J. Levett, Rev. By M. F. Burnyeat.” In Plato. The Complete Works, edited by John M. Cooper and D. S. Hutchinson. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Prior, Arthur. 2006. “The Correspondence Theory of Truth.” In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Donald M. Borchert, 2nd ed. Vol. 2. Farmington Hills: Thomson Gale.
Ramsey, Frank P. 1978. “Universals.” In Foundations. Essays in Philosophy, Logic, Mathematics and Economics, edited by D. H. Mellor. London and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Russell, Bertrand. 1903. The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge University Press.
———. 1905. “On Denoting.” Mind 14 (56): 479–93.
———. 1906a. “Review of Harold Joachim: The Nature of Truth (Oxford: Clarendon 1906).” Mind 15 (60): 528–33.
———. 1906b. “What Is Truth? Review of Harold Joachim The Nature of Truth (Oxford: Clarendon 1906).” The Independent Review 9: 349–53.
———. 1907. “On the Nature of Truth.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 7: 28–49.
———. 1910a. “On the Nature of Truth and Falsehood.” In Philosophical Essays. London, New York, Bombay and Calcutta: Longmans, Green, and Co.
———. 1910b. Philosophical Essays. London, New York, Bombay and Calcutta: Longmans, Green, and Co.
———. 1910c. “Pragmatism.” In Philosophical Essays. London, New York, Bombay and Calcutta: Longmans, Green, and Co.
———. 1910d. “William James’s Conception of Truth.” In Philosophical Essays. London, New York, Bombay and Calcutta: Longmans, Green, and Co.
———. 1911a. “Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11: 108–28.
———. 1911b. “Le Réalisme Analytic.” Bulletin de La Société Française de La Philosophie 11: 55-82. Quoted after the transcript from https://www.sofrphilo.fr/activites-scientifiques-de-la-sfp/conferences/grandes-conferences-en-telechargement/.
———. 1912. The Problems of Philosophy. New York: Henry Holt and Company; London: Williams and Norgate.
———. 1914. Our Knowledge of the External World. Chicago, London: Open Court.
———. 1917. Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays. London: Allen and Unwin.
———. 1918. “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism [Lectures I and II].” The Monist 28 (4): 495–527.
———. 1919a. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. Routledge.
———. 1919b. “On Propositions: What They Are and How They Mean.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 2: 1–43.
———. 1919c. “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism [Lectures III and IV].” The Monist 29 (1): 32–63.
———. 1919d. “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism [Lectures V and VI].” The Monist 29 (2): 190–222.
———. 1919e. “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism [Lectures VII and VIII].” The Monist 29 (3): 345–80.
———. 1919f. “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. III. Atomic and Molecular Propositions.” The Monist 29 (1): 32–63.
———. 1951. “Logical Atomism.” In Logic and Knowledge. Essays 1901-1950. London: Allen and Unwin.
———. 1956. Logic and Knowledge. Essays 1901-1950. Edited by Robert Charles Marsh. London: Allen and Unwin.
———. 1986. The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell. Vol. 8: The Philosophy of Logical Atomism and Other Essays 1914-19. Edited by John G. Slater. London, Boston, Sidney: George Allen and Unwin.
———. 1992a. The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell. Vol. 6: Logical and Philosophical Papers 1909-13. Edited by John G. Slater. London, New York: Routledge.
———. 1992b. Theory of Knowledge. The 1913 Manuscript. Edited by Elizabeth Ramsden Eames Kenneth Blackwell. London, New York: Routledge.
———. 2014. The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell. Vol. 5: Towards “Principia Mathematica” 1905-1908. Edited by Gregory H. Moore. Oxford, New York: Routledge.
———. n.d. “On the Relation Between Universals and Particulars.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 12: 1–24.
Salmon, Nathan. 1986. Frege’s Puzzle. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Soames, Scott. 1987. “Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content.” Philosophical Topics 15 (1): 47–87.
Tegtmeier, Erwin. 1992. Grundzüge Einer Kategorialen Ontologie. Dinge, Eigenschaften, Beziehungen, Sachverhalte. Freiburg, Munich: Alber.
Weiss, Bernhard. 1995. “On the Demise of Russell’s Multiple Relations Theory of Judgement.” Theoria 61 (3): 261–82.
———. 2022. “Facts, Knowledge, and Knowledge of Facts.” In Knowledge, Number and Reality, edited by Nils Kürbis, Bahram Assadian, and Jonathan Nassim. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Whitehead, Alfred North, and Bertrand Russell. 1910. Principia Mathematica. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1997. Principia Mathematica to *56. Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the Creative Commons license. The Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy requires authors to agree to a Creative Commons Attribution /Non-commercial license. Authors who publish with the Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
